Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Ernst & Young P/S v Konkurrencerådet (C-633/16)
Questions 1 to 3
56

Ernst & Young P/S v Konkurrencerådet (C-633/16)

Judgment of 31 May 2018law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-633-16/para_56@2026-11-11

56As follows from Article 21(1) of Regulation No 139/2004, that regulation alone is to apply to concentrations as defined in Article 3 of the regulation, to which Regulation No 1/2003 is not, in principle, applicable (judgment of 7 September 2017, Austria Asphalt, C‑248/16, EU:C:2017:643, paragraph 32).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-633/16 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:371
Decided: 31 May 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Sø- og Handelsretten (Maritime and Commercial Court, Denmark)
Applicant: Ernst & Young P/S
Defendant: Konkurrencerådet
Rapporteur: A. Tizzano
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, A. Tizzano, A. Borg Barthet, M. Berger, F. Biltgen
Language: Danish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0633

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

31 May 2018Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance)
Cited by 3: Towercast v Autorité de la concurrence and Ministère de l’Économie (C-449/21); Altice Group Lux Sàrl v European Commission (C-746/21 P)9 provisions; Canon Inc. v European Commission (T-609/19)15 provisions
Cites 6: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance); Austria Asphalt GmbH & Co OG v Bundeskartellanwalt (C-248/16)2 provisions; Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato v Ente tabacchi italiani - ETI SpA and Others and Philip Morris Products SA and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato and Others (C-280/06); Allianz Hungária Biztosító Zrt. and Others v Gazdasági Versenyhivatal (C-32/11)