Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Mohammad Khir Amayry v Migrationsverket (C-60/16)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The fourth question
68

Mohammad Khir Amayry v Migrationsverket (C-60/16)

Judgment of 13 Sept 2017law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-60-16/para_68@2026-11-10

68However, in such a case, the person concerned finds himself in a situation in every respect comparable to that of a person whose appeal or review is recognised as having suspensive effect pursuant to Article 27(3) of that regulation.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-60/16 · ECLI:EU:C:2017:675
Decided: 13 Sept 2017
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Kammarrätten i Stockholm — Migrationsöverdomstolen (Administrative Court of Appeal for Immigration Matters, Stockholm, Sweden)
Applicant: Mohammad Khir Amayry
Defendant: Migrationsverket
Rapporteur: L. Bay Larsen
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 5 judges
L. Bay Larsen, M. Vilaras, J. Malenovský, M. Safjan, D. Šváby
Language: Swedish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0060

Topics

History · 1 version

13 Sept 2017Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast)
Cited by 6: Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Aziz Hasan (C-360/16); Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v S.S. and Others (C-338/21)2 provisions; Bundesrepublik Deutschland v MA and Others (C-245/21)2 provisions; Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie v H. and R (C-582/17, C-583/17); X and X v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-47/17, C-48/17); Adil Hassan v Préfet du Pas-de-Calais (C-647/16)
Cites 11: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); J. N. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-601/15 PPU); Minister for Justice and Equality v Tomas Vilkas (C-640/15); Policie ČR, Krajské ředitelství policie Ústeckého kraje, odbor cizinecké policie v Salah Al Chodor and Others (C-528/15); Migrationsverket v Edgar Petrosian and Others (C-19/08); Minister for Justice and Equality v Francis Lanigan (C-237/15 PPU); Mehrdad Ghezelbash v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-63/15); Rahmanian Koushkaki v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-84/12); Shiraz Baig Mirza v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal (C-695/15 PPU); Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast); Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast)