Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Stadt Wuppertal v Maria Elisabeth Bauer and Volker Willmeroth v Martina Broßonn (C-569/16, C-570/16)
Consideration of the questions referred
Substance
The second part of the question in Cas…
65

Stadt Wuppertal v Maria Elisabeth Bauer and Volker Willmeroth v Martina Broßonn (C-569/16, C-570/16)

Judgment of 6 Nov 2018law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-569-16/para_65@2026-11-10

65As a preliminary point, it should be recalled that the question whether a national provision must be disapplied in as much as it conflicts with EU law arises only if no interpretation of that provision which is compatible with EU law proves possible.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Cases: C-569/16, C-570/16 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:871
Decided: 6 Nov 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicants: Stadt Wuppertal; Volker Willmeroth
Defendants: Maria Elisabeth Bauer; Martina Broßonn
Rapporteur: A. Prechal
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 13 judges
K. Lenaerts, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Prechal, M. Vilaras, T. von Danwitz, F. Biltgen, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos, M. Ilešič, J. Malenovský, E. Levits, L. Bay Larsen, S. Rodin
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0569

Topics

Approximation of laws Charter of Fundamental Rights Freedom of movement for workers Social policy

History · 1 version

6 Nov 2018Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time
Cited by 19: FY v Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej (C-582/21); Criminal proceedings against Daniel Adam Popławski (C-573/17); Profi Credit Bulgaria v T.I.T (C-170/21); Terveys- ja sosiaalialan neuvottelujärjestö (TSN) ry v Hyvinvointialan liitto ry and Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry v Satamaoperaattorit ry (C-609/17, C-610/17); this act6 provisions; Criminal proceedings against V.S (C-80/23); Tesco-Global Áruházak Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (C-323/18); S v Minister van Asiel en Migratie (C-198/25); LF v Sanofi Pasteur SA (C-338/24); YQ v Ředitelství silnic a dálnic ČR (C-57/22); WD v job-medium GmbH (C-233/20); Instituto Madrileño de Investigación y Desarrollo Rural, Agrario y Alimentario v JN (C-726/19); Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti v Organismul Intermediar pentru Programul Operaţional Capital Uman - Ministerul Educaţiei Naţionale (C-585/19)2 provisions; European Commission and Council of the European Union v Francisco Carreras Sequeros and Others (C-119/19 P, C-126/19 P); QH v Varhoven kasatsionen sad na Republika Bulgaria and CV v Iccrea Banca SpA (C-762/18, C-37/19); Vodafone Magyarország Mobil Távközlési Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (C-75/18); Federación de Servicios de Comisiones Obreras (CCOO) v Deutsche Bank SAE (C-55/18); Cresco Investigation GmbH v Markus Achatzi (C-193/17); Sindicatul Familia Constanţa and Others v Direcţia Generală de Asistenţă Socială şi Protecţia Copilului Constanţa (C-147/17)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time; 'SEGRO' Kft. v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal Sárvári Járási Földhivatala and Günther Horváth v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal (C-52/16, C-113/16); Vera Egenberger v Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung e.V (C-414/16); Association de médiation sociale v Union locale des syndicats CGT and Others (C-176/12); Maribel Dominguez v Centre informatique du Centre Ouest Atlantique and Préfet de la région Centre (C-282/10); Angelo Alberto Torresi and Pierfrancesco Torresi v Consiglio dell’Ordine degli Avvocati di Macerata (C-58/13, C-59/13); David Smith v Patrick Meade and Others (C-122/17); KHS AG v Winfried Schulte (C-214/10); Gérard Fenoll v Centre d'aide par le travail "La Jouvene" and Association de parents et d'amis de personnes handicapées mentales (APEI) d'Avignon (C-316/13); Hans Maschek v Magistratsdirektion der Stadt Wien - Personalstelle Wiener Stadtwerke (C-341/15); Alicja Sobczyszyn v Szkoła Podstawowa w Rzeplinie (C-178/15); Conley King v The Sash Window Workshop Ltd and Richard Dollar (C-214/16); Gerhard Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund and Stringer and Others v Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (C-350/06); Williams and Others v British Airways plc (C-155/10); Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organization of working time