Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
A and S v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-550/16)
Consideration of the question referred
33

A and S v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-550/16)

Judgment of 12 Apr 2018law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-550-16/para_33@2026-11-10

33One of those more favourable conditions concerns family reunification with first-degree relatives in the direct ascending line of the refugee.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-550/16 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:248
Decided: 12 Apr 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Rechtbank Den Haag (District Court, The Hague, Netherlands)
Applicants: A; S
Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
Rapporteur: M. Ilešič
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, A. Rosas, C. Toader, A. Prechal, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0550

Topics

Immigration policy

History · 1 version

12 Apr 2018Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification
Cited by 12: E.K. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-624/20); M and Others v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (C-391/16, C-77/17, C-78/17); B. M. M. and Others v État belge (C-133/19, C-136/19, C-137/19)2 provisions; CR and Others v Landeshauptmann von Wien (C-560/20)2 provisions; X v Belgische Staat (C-230/21); Bundesrepublik Deutschland v XC (C-279/20)8 provisions; Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SW and Others (C-273/20)4 provisions; I and S v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-19/21); Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SE (C-768/19)2 provisions; G.S. and V.G. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-381/18, C-382/18); TB v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal (C-519/18); Alekszij Torubarov v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal (C-556/17)
Cites 8: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast); Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (recast); Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification; O and S v Maahanmuuttovirasto and Maahanmuuttovirasto v L (C-356/11, C-357/11); H. T. v Land Baden-Württemberg (C-373/13); Marjan Noorzia v Bundesministerin für Inneres (C-338/13); Criminal proceedings against Mossa Ouhrami (C-225/16)