Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-5/16)
Findings of the Court
The fourth and fifth pleas in law
Findings of the Court
159

Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-5/16)

Judgment of 21 Jun 2018law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-5-16/para_159@2026-11-10

159Moreover, it must be recalled that the Court has found that an impact assessment is not binding on either the Parliament or the Council (judgment of 8 July 2010, Afton Chemical, C‑343/09, EU:C:2010:419, paragraph 57).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-5/16 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:483
Decided: 21 Jun 2018
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Republic of Poland
Defendants: European Parliament; Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: A. Rosas
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, A. Tizzano, A. Rosas, C. Toader, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: Polish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0005

Topics

History · 1 version

21 Jun 2018Reading

Connections

Cited by 16: Czech Republic v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-482/17); Verband der Deutschen Kutter- und Küstenfischer eV (VDK) v European Commission (T-265/23); Carmeuse Holding SRL v European Commission (T-554/22); Carmeuse Holding SRL v European Commission (T-385/22); Nord Stream 2 AG v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (T-526/19 R); RL v Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden (C-61/22)2 provisions; Symphony Environmental Technologies plc and Symphony Environmental Ltd v European Parliament and Others (T-745/20); Arctic Paper Grycksbo AB v European Commission (T-269/21); Italian Republic and Comune di Milano v Council of the European Union and European Parliament (C-106/19); Energieversorgungscenter Dresden-Wilschdorf GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-938/19); Exxonmobil Petroleum & Chemical BVBA v European Chemicals Agency (T-177/19); OS v European Commission (T-528/16); Pierre-Alexis Feral v Comittee of the Regions (T-529/16); Margarita Tàpias v Council of the European Union (T-527/16); Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-128/17); Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health (C-151/17)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Afton Chemical Limited v Secretary of State for Transport (C-343/09)2 provisions; Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Tiziana Bruno and Massimo Pettini and Daniela Lotti and Clara Matteucci (C-395/08, C-396/08); Agrargenossenschaft Neuzelle eG v Landrat des Landkreises Oder-Spree (C-545/11); Global Starnet Ltd v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Amministrazione Autonoma Monopoli di Stato (C-322/16); Société Arcelor Atlantique et Lorraine and Others v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Écologie et du Développement durable and Ministre de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie (C-127/07); Slovak Republic and Hungary v Council of the European Union (C-643/15, C-647/15); Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (Text with EEA relevance); Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community (Text with EEA relevance); Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union (C-310/04); Republic of Estonia v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-508/13); Council of the European Union v European Commission (C-409/13); Decision (EU) 2015/1814 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 2015 concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme and amending Directive 2003/87/EC (Text with EEA relevance); Billerud Karlsborg AB and Billerud Skärblacka AB v Naturvårdsverket (C-203/12); European Commission v Council of the European Union (C-377/12); Commission of the European Communities v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-178/03); Council of the European Union v European Commission (C-73/14); Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union (C-36/98); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-42/97)