Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Dyson Ltd v European Commission (C-44/16 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The first ground of appeal
Findings of the Court
61

Dyson Ltd v European Commission (C-44/16 P)

Judgment of 11 May 2017law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-44-16/para_61@2026-11-10

61The essential elements of basic legislation are those which, in order to be adopted, require political choices falling within the responsibilities of the EU legislature (judgment of 5 September 2012, Parliament v Council, C‑355/10, EU:C:2012:516, paragraph 65).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Ninth Chamber
Case: C-44/16 P · ECLI:EU:C:2017:357
Decided: 11 May 2017
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62013TJ0544
Applicant: Dyson Ltd
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: C. Lycourgos
Advocate General: H. Saugmandsgaard Øe
Bench: 3 judges
E. Juhász, C. Vajda, C. Lycourgos
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0044

Topics

History · 1 version

11 May 2017Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Dyson Ltd v European Commission (T-544/13)
Cited by 24: Robin Wood - Gewaltfreie Aktionsgemeinschaft für Natur und Umwelt eV and Others v European Commission (T-575/22); Siegfried PharmaChemikalien Minden GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld (C-617/24); Fédération environnement durable and Others v European Commission (T-583/22); ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission (T-579/22); Norddeutsche Landesbank – Girozentrale v Single Resolution Board (T-476/23); Banco Cooperativo Español, SA v Single Resolution Board (T-499/20); Norddeutsche Landesbank – Girozentrale v Single Resolution Board (T-407/22); Norddeutsche Landesbank – Girozentrale v Single Resolution Board (T-403/21); Deutsche Bank AG v Single Resolution Board (T-396/21); Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v Single Resolution Board (T-142/22); Norddeutsche Landesbank – Girozentrale v Single Resolution Board (T-412/21); Unichem Laboratories Ltd v European Commission (C-166/19); Niche Generics Ltd v European Commission (C-164/19); Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board (T-360/21); Max Heinr. Sutor OHG v Single Resolution Board (T-393/21); Bayerische Landesbank v Single Resolution Board (T-394/21); Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale v Single Resolution Board (T-392/21); DZ Hyp AG v Single Resolution Board (T-395/21); DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main v Single Resolution Board (T-390/21); DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main, formerly DVB Bank SE v Single Resolution Board (T-404/21); Deutsche Kreditbank AG v Single Resolution Board (T-391/21); Dexia Crédit Local v Single Resolution Board (T-405/21); Dyson Ltd and Others v European Commission (C-122/22 P)2 provisions; Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v Single Resolution Board (T-389/21)
Cites 15: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Commission (C-398/13 P); Pensa Pharma, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (C-442/15); European Parliament v European Commission (C-286/14); Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd and Nippon Steel Corp. v Commission of the European Communities (C-403/04 P, C-405/04 P); DK Recycling und Roheisen GmbH v European Commission (C-540/14 P); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-355/10)2 provisions; PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas) v Council of the European Union (C-468/15 P); Siemens AG and Others v European Commission (C-239/11); Toshiba Corp. v European Commission (C-623/15 P); Dyson Ltd v European Commission (T-544/13); Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products (recast) (Text with EEA relevance); Alliance One International, Inc. v European Commission (C-593/11); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-363/14); Christos Gogos v European Commission (C-583/08 P)