Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Vera Egenberger v Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung e.V (C-414/16)
Consideration of the questions referred
Question 1
56

Vera Egenberger v Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung e.V (C-414/16)

Judgment of 17 Apr 2018law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-414-16/para_56@2026-11-10

56Article 17 TFEU cannot invalidate that conclusion.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-414/16 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:257
Decided: 17 Apr 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Federal Labour Court, Germany)
Applicant: Vera Egenberger
Defendant: Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung eV
Rapporteur: F. Biltgen
Advocate General: E. Tanchev
Bench: 15 judges
K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, R. Silva de Lapuerta, T. von Danwitz, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, A. Rosas, E. Juhász, M. Safjan, D. Šváby, M. Berger, A. Prechal, E. Jarašiūnas, F. Biltgen, M. Vilaras, E. Regan
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0414

Topics

Principles of Union law Social policy

History · 1 version

17 Apr 2018Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation
Cited by 24: FY v Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej (C-582/21); KUBERA, trgovanje s hrano in pijačo, d.o.o. v Republika Slovenija (C-144/23); „Ati-19“ EOOD v Nachalnik na otdel „Operativni deynosti“ – Sofia v Glavna direktsia „Fiskalen kontrol“ pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite (C-605/23); KT and Others v Dirección General de la Función Pública, adscrita al Departamento de la Presidenia de la Generalitat de Catalunya and Departamento de Justicia de la Generalitat de Catalunya (C-331/22)2 provisions; A.B. and Others v Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa and Others (C-824/18); EPIC Financial Consulting Ges.m.b.H. v Republik Österreich and Bundesbeschaffung GmbH (C-274/21); ASG 2 Ausgleichsgesellschaft für die Sägeindustrie Nordrhein-Westfalen GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (C-253/23); Jakub Cupriak-Trojan and Mateusz Trojan v Wojewoda Mazowiecki (C-713/23); Criminal proceedings against VD bd]& (C-339/20); WS v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-505/19); S v Minister van Asiel en Migratie (C-198/25); LF v Sanofi Pasteur SA (C-338/24); Katholische Schwangerschaftsberatung v JB (C-258/24); Royal Football Club Seraing v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Others (C-600/23); OB v Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Bologna (C-460/23); XL and Others v Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku and Lietuvos Respublika (C-146/23); K.L. v X sp. z o.o (C-715/20); OP v European Parliament (T-143/22); European Commission v Sopra Steria Benelux and Unisys Belgium (C-101/22 P); Freikirche der Siebenten-Tags-Adventisten in Deutschland KdöR v Bildungsdirektion für Vorarlberg (C-372/21); European Commission and Council of the European Union v VW and Others (C-116/21 P); XXXX v HR Rail SA (C-485/20); YT and Others v Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca - MIUR and Ufficio Scolastico Regionale per la Campania (C-282/19); Diskrimineringsombudsmannen v Braathens Regional Aviation AB (C-30/19)
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Berlioz Investment Fund SA v Directeur de l'administration des contributions directes (C-682/15); Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation; Association de médiation sociale v Union locale des syndicats CGT and Others (C-176/12); Eugen Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzüge v Republik Österreich (C-112/00); Cruciano Siragusa v Regione Sicilia — Soprintendenza Beni Culturali e Ambientali di Palermo (C-206/13); European Commission v Vanbreda Risk & Benefits (C-35/15); Werner Mangold v Rüdiger Helm (C-144/04); International Transport Workers’ Federation and Finnish Seamen’s Union v Viking Line ABP and OÜ Viking Line Eesti (C-438/05); Angelo Ferlini v Centre hospitalier de Luxembourg (C-411/98); Jürgen Römer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (C-147/08); Roman Angonese v Cassa di Risparmio di Bolzano SpA (C-281/98); Gabrielle Defrenne v Société anonyme belge de navigation aérienne Sabena (C-43/75); Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland e.V. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-461/13); Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken v K and A (C-153/14); Dansk Industri (DI), acting on behalf of Ajos A/S v Estate of Karsten Eigil Rasmussen (C-441/14)