Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-405/16 P)
The appeal
The first ground of appeal, alleging i…
Findings of the Court
–The first part of the first ground of…
50

Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-405/16 P)

Judgment of 28 Mar 2019law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-405-16/para_50@2026-11-10

50In the present case, the General Court held, in paragraph 40 of the judgment under appeal, that the support and compensation mechanisms at issue in the present case were established by the EEG 2012, with the result that they should be regarded as imputable to the State.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-405/16 P · ECLI:EU:C:2019:268
Decided: 28 Mar 2019
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: Decision 2015/1585, 62015TJ0047
Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: M. Vilaras
Advocate General: M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona
Bench: 5 judges
M. Vilaras, J. Malenovský, L. Bay Larsen, M. Safjan, D. Šváby
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0405

Topics

History · 1 version

28 Mar 2019Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-47/15); Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (notified under document C(2014) 8786) (Text with EEA relevance)
Cited by 15: WEPA Hygieneprodukte GmbH and Others v European Commission (C-795/21 P)2 provisions; Covestro Deutschland AG and Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-790/21 P); AZ and Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-792/21 P); Federal Republic of Germany and Others v European Commission (C-794/21 P); Autorità di Regolazione per Energia Reti e Ambiente (ARERA) v Fallimento Esperia spa and Gestore dei Servizi Energetici SpA - GSE (C-558/22); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-409/21)6 provisions; SIA 'DOBELES HES' and Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija (C-702/20); Covestro Deutschland AG v European Commission (T-745/18)5 provisions; Wepa Hygieneprodukte GmbH and Others v European Commission (T-238/19); Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. KG and Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission (T-233/19); AZ v European Commission (T-196/19); FVE Holýšov I s. r. o. and Others v European Commission (C-850/19); Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and Others v European Commission (T-516/18, T-525/18); Hacène Bezouaoui and HB Consultant v European Commission (T-478/18); Société Eco TLC v Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire and Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances (C-556/19)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; PreussenElektra AG v Schhleswag AG, in the presence of Windpark Reußenköge III GmbH and Land Schleswig-Holstein (C-379/98); Kwekerij Gebroeders van der Kooy BV and others v Commission of the European Communities (C-67/85); Essent Netwerk Noord BV supported by Nederlands Elektriciteit Administratiekantoor BV v Aluminium Delfzijl BV, and in the indemnification proceedings Aluminium Delfzijl BV v Staat der Nederlanden and in the indemnification proceedings Essent Netwerk Noord BV v Nederlands Elektriciteit Administratiekantoor BV and Saranne BV (C-206/06); ENEA S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki (C-329/15); French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-482/99); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-173/73); Steinike & Weinlig v Federal Republic of Germany (C-78/76); Trapeza Eurobank Ergasias AE v Agrotiki Trapeza tis Ellados AE (ATE) and Pavlos Sidiropoulos (C-690/13); Association Vent De Colère! Fédération nationale and Others v Ministre de l’Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement and Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie (C-262/12); Bouygues SA and Others v European Commission and Others (C-399/10 P, C-401/10 P); Ministerio de Defensa and Navantia SA v Concello de Ferrol (C-522/13); European Commission v TV2/Danmark A/S (C-656/15 P); Doux Élevage SNC and Coopérative agricole UKL-ARREE v Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Alimentation, de la Pêche, de la Ruralité et de l’Aménagement du territoire and Comité interprofessionnel de la dinde française (CIDEF) (C-677/11); Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (notified under document C(2014) 8786) (Text with EEA relevance); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-47/15); Georgsmarienhütte GmbH and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-135/16); European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-279/08 P)