Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
T.KUP SAS v Belgische Staat (C-349/16)
Judgment
Substance
The first three questions
31

T.KUP SAS v Belgische Staat (C-349/16)

Judgment of 15 Jun 2017law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-349-16/para_31@2026-11-11

31It follows that, where they select the second sampling method, the institutions of the Union have some discretion, relating to the prospective assessment of what it is reasonably possible for them to accomplish in the conduct of their investigation within the prescribed time-limit.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Eighth Chamber
Case: C-349/16 · ECLI:EU:C:2017:469
Decided: 15 Jun 2017
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel (Dutch-language Court of First Instance, Brussels, Belgium)
Upheld as valid: Regulation 2009/1294
Applicant: T.KUP SAS
Defendant: Belgische Staat
Rapporteur: M. Vilaras
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 3 judges
M. Vilaras, M. Safjan, D. Šváby
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0349

Topics

History · 1 version

15 Jun 2017Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community; Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and originating in the People's Republic of China, as extended to imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather consigned from the Macao SAR, whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96
Cited by 7: BL v MediaMarktSaturn Hagen-Iserlohn GmbH (C-687/21); PT Musim Mas v European Commission (T-176/23); Hitit Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Commission (T-230/23); China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v European Commission (T-254/18)2 provisions; Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v Distillerie Bonollo SpA and Others (C-461/18 P); Yieh United Steel Corp. v European Commission (T-607/15); Caviro Distillerie Srl and Others v European Commission (T-211/16)2 provisions
Cites 9: Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v Secretary of State for Health (C-547/14); Pillbox 38 (UK) Limited, trading as Totally Wicked v Secretary of State for Health (C-477/14); Council Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 of 5 October 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam; Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union (C-249/10 P); Commission Regulation (EC) No 553/2006 of 23 March 2006 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam; Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and originating in the People's Republic of China, as extended to imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather consigned from the Macao SAR, whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96; Karim Boudjellal v Rauwers Contrôle SA (C-508/16); Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community; Fliesen-Zentrum Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Regensburg (C-687/13)