Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Industrias Químicas del Vallés, SA v European Commission (C-244/16 P)
The appeal
The second ground of appeal
Findings of the Court
104

Industrias Químicas del Vallés, SA v European Commission (C-244/16 P)

Judgment of 13 Mar 2018law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-244-16/para_104@2026-11-11

104It follows that references on validity constitute, like actions for annulment, means for reviewing the legality of European Union acts (judgment of 28 April 2015, T & L Sugars and Sidul Açúcares v Commission, C‑456/13 P, EU:C:2015:284, paragraph 47 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-244/16 P · ECLI:EU:C:2018:177
Decided: 13 Mar 2018
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Industrias Químicas del Vallés SA
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: E. Regan
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 15 judges
K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, R. Silva de Lapuerta, T. von Danwitz, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, A. Rosas, C.G. Fernlund, C. Vajda, C. Toader, M. Safjan, D. Šváby, M. Berger, A. Prechal, E. Jarašiūnas, E. Regan
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0244

Topics

History · 1 version

13 Mar 2018Reading

Connections

Cited by 20: Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-743/21); Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission (T-827/22); Fresenius Kabi Austria GmbH and Others v European Commission (T-416/22); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-146/22); Ryanair DAC and Malta Air ltd. v European Commission (T-216/21); Ryanair DAC and Malta Air ltd. v European Commission (T-494/21); Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission (T-332/21); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-737/20); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-14/21); Ryanair DAC and Condor Flugdienst GmbH v European Commission (T-34/21); Robert Roos and Others v European Parliament (T-710/21); Deutsche Lufthansa AG v European Commission (C-594/19 P); Deutsche Lufthansa AG v European Commission (C-453/19 P); Pharmaceutical Works Polpharma S.A. v European Medicines Agency (T-611/18); VodafoneZiggo Group BV v European Commission (C-689/19 P)2 provisions; Associazione Nazionale GranoSalus - Liberi Cerealicoltori & Consumatori (Associazione GranoSalus) v European Commission (C-313/19); Council of the European Union v Marquis Energy LLC (C-466/16 P); Council of the European Union v Growth Energy and Renewable Fuels Association (C-465/16 P); Internacional de Productos Metálicos, SA v European Commission (C-145/17 P); Rotho Blaas Srl v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli (C-207/17)
Cites 19: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-583/11 P); Telefónica SA v European Commission (C-274/12 P); T & L Sugars Ltd and Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda v European Commission (C-456/13 P)2 provisions; Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC; Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 of 25 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of approved active substances Text with EEA relevance; Kyocera Mita Europe BV v European Commission (C-553/14); Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 of 11 March 2015 on implementing Article 80(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and establishing a list of candidates for substitution Text with EEA relevance; Commission of the European Communities v Nederlandse Antillen (C-142/00 P); Commission Directive 2010/28/EU of 23 April 2010 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include metalaxyl as active substance (Text with EEA relevance); 2003/308/EC: Commission Decision of 2 May 2003 concerning the non-inclusion of metalaxyl in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant-protection products containing this active substance (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2003) 1421); Industrias Químicas del Vallés, SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-158/03); Industrias Químicas del Vallés, SA v European Commission (T-296/15); Mory SA and Others v European Commission (C-33/14 P); Industrias Químicas del Vallés SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-326/05 P); Plaumann & Co. v Commission of the European Economic Community (25/62)