Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Dimos Zagoriou (C-217/16)
Consideration of the questions referred
The third and fourth questions
29

European Commission v Dimos Zagoriou (C-217/16)

Judgment of 9 Nov 2017law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-217-16/para_29@2026-11-10

29It follows from that provision that those acts may be enforced against persons to whom they relate, other than States.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-217/16 · ECLI:EU:C:2017:841
Decided: 9 Nov 2017
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Efeteio Athinon (Court of Appeal, Athens, Greece)
Applicant: European Commission
Defendant: Dimos Zagoriou
Rapporteur: L. Bay Larsen
Advocate General: M. Bobek
Bench: 5 judges
L. Bay Larsen, J. Malenovský, M. Safjan, D. Šváby, M. Vilaras
Language: Greek
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0217

Topics

Law governing the institutions

History · 1 version

9 Nov 2017Reading

Connections

Interprets 4: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 of 19 December 1988, laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 as regards coordination of the activities of the different Structural Funds between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments; Council Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 of 24 June 1988 on the tasks of the Structural Funds and their effectiveness and on coordination of their activities between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments; Council Regulation (EEC) No 4256/88 of 19 December 1988, laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 as regards the EAGGF Guidance Section
Cited by 4: X and Y v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-180/17); European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) v Hallertauer Hopfenveredelungsges. m.b.H (C-256/23)2 provisions; Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro AE v European Commission (T-191/16); X v Belastingdienst/Toeslagen (C-175/17)
Cites 8: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Nóra Baczó and János István Vizsnyiczai v Raiffeisen Bank Zrt (C-567/13); ET Agrokonsulting-04-Velko Stoyanov v Izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond ‘Zemedelie’ — Razplashtatelna agentsia (C-93/12); Council Regulation (EEC) No 4256/88 of 19 December 1988, laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 as regards the EAGGF Guidance Section; B.S. Levez v T.H. Jennings (Harlow Pools) Ltd (C-326/96); Council Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 of 24 June 1988 on the tasks of the Structural Funds and their effectiveness and on coordination of their activities between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments; Council Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 of 19 December 1988, laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 as regards coordination of the activities of the different Structural Funds between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments; Vereniging Nationaal Overlegorgaan Sociale Werkvoorziening and Gemeente Rotterdam v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid and Sociaal Economische Samenwerking West-Brabant v Algemene Directie voor de Arbeidsvoorziening (C-383/06)