Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Werner Fries v Lufthansa CityLine GmbH (C-190/16)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The first and second questions
Article 21(1) of the Charter
39

Werner Fries v Lufthansa CityLine GmbH (C-190/16)

Judgment of 5 Jul 2017law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-190-16/para_39@2026-11-10

39However, it must still be determined whether that limitation meets an objective of general interest, within the meaning of Article 52(1) of the Charter, and if so, whether it observes the principle of proportionality within the meaning of that provision.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-190/16 · ECLI:EU:C:2017:513
Decided: 5 Jul 2017
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Federal Labour Court, Germany)
Upheld as valid: Regulation 2011/1178
Applicant: Werner Fries
Defendant: Lufthansa CityLine GmbH
Rapporteur: R. Silva de Lapuerta
Advocate General: M. Bobek
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, E. Regan, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, S. Rodin
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0190

Topics

History · 1 version

5 Jul 2017Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council Text with EEA relevance
Cited by 22: État luxembourgeois v B and Others (C-245/19, C-246/19)2 provisions; Skeyes v Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd (C-353/20); RTL Nederland BV and RTL Nieuws BV v Minister van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat (C-451/22); OP v European Parliament (T-143/22); Ian James Bowden and Janey Young v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (T-72/21); Robert Roos and Others v European Parliament (T-710/21); Verena Kühne v European Parliament (T-468/20); KM v European Commission (T-374/20); FI v European Commission (T-694/19); VW v European Commission (T-243/18); BT v European Commission (T-315/19); RN v European Commission (T-442/17 R); Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe (ACRE) v European Parliament (T-107/19); A v Veselības ministrija (C-243/19); Alliance for Direct Democracy in Europe ASBL (ADDE) v European Parliament (T-48/17); Francis Wattiau v European Parliament (T-737/17); RK v Council of the European Union (T-11/17)2 provisions; FV v Council of the European Union (T-750/16)2 provisions; Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health (C-151/17); Mohamed Marouen Ben Ali Ben Mohamed Mabrouk v Council of the European Union (T-216/17); UAB ‘Spika’ and Others v Žuvininkystės tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos žemės ūkio ministerijos (C-540/16); Pegasus v European Parliament (T-57/17)
Cites 12: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation; Geoffrey Léger v Ministre des Affaires sociales, de la Santé et des Droits des femmes and Etablissement français du sang (C-528/13); Gerhard Fuchs and Peter Köhler v Land Hessen (C-159/10, C-160/10); Association Belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL and Others v Conseil des ministres (C-236/09); Wolfgang Glatzel v Freistaat Bayern (C-356/12); Domnica Petersen v Berufungsausschuss für Zahnärzte für den Bezirk Westfalen-Lippe (C-341/08); Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council Text with EEA relevance; Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC (Text with EEA relevance); Torsten Hörnfeldt v Posten Meddelande AB (C-141/11); Reinhard Prigge and Others v Deutsche Lufthansa AG (C-447/09); Deutsches Weintor eG v Land Rheinland-Pfalz (C-544/10)