Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Toufik Lounes v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-165/16)
Judgment
Consideration of the question referred
Interpretation of Article 21(1) TFEU
56

Toufik Lounes v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-165/16)

Judgment of 14 Nov 2017law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-165-16/para_56@2026-11-10

56In the second place, the rights conferred on a Union citizen by Article 21(1) TFEU, including the derived rights enjoyed by his family members, are intended, amongst other things, to promote the gradual integration of the Union citizen concerned in the society of the host Member State.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-165/16 · ECLI:EU:C:2017:862
Decided: 14 Nov 2017
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom)
Applicant: Toufik Lounes
Defendant: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Rapporteur: A. Tizzano
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 15 judges
K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, R. Silva de Lapuerta, M. Ilešič, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, J. Malenovský, E. Levits, C.G. Fernlund, C. Vajda, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, S. Rodin, F. Biltgen, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0165

Topics

Border checks Citizenship of the Union

History · 1 version

14 Nov 2017Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance)
Cited by 18: College van Burgemeester en Wethouders van de gemeente Amersfoort v X BV and Visser Vastgoed Beleggingen BV v Raad van de gemeente Appingedam (C-360/15, C-31/16); Jakub Cupriak-Trojan and Mateusz Trojan v Wojewoda Mazowiecki (C-713/23); Relu Adrian Coman and Others v Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări and Ministerul Afacerilor Interne (C-673/16); R.S. v Minister for Justice (C-560/24)2 provisions; B v Niedersächsischer Zweckverband zur Approbationserteilung (NiZzA) (C-573/24); XXX v État belge (C-607/21); European Commission v Czech Republic (C-808/21)2 provisions; European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-814/21)2 provisions; GV v Chief Appeals Officer and Others (C-488/21); X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-459/20); JY v Wiener Landesregierung (C-118/20)2 provisions; Criminal proceedings against A (C-35/20); Colin Brown v European Commission (T-18/19); Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real v RH (C-836/18); Nalini Chenchooliah v Minister for Justice and Equality (C-94/18); TopFit e.V. and Daniele Biffi v Deutscher Leichtathletikverband e.V (C-22/18)2 provisions; ‘TTL’ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ - Sofia (C-553/16); Ibrahima Diallo v État belge (C-246/17)
Cites 11: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance); Proceedings brought by Mircea Florian Freitag (C-541/15); The Queen, on the application of Sean Ambrose McCarthy and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-202/13); Yoshikazu Iida v Stadt Ulm (C-40/11); Alfredo Rendón Marín v Administración del Estado (C-165/14); Shirley McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-434/09); Blaise Baheten Metock and Others v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (C-127/08); Opinion of the Advocate General (C-165/16); H.C. Chavez-Vilchez and Others v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank and Others (C-133/15); O. v Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel and Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel v B (C-456/12)