Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Georgsmarienhütte GmbH and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-135/16)
Admissibility of the request for a pre…
37

Georgsmarienhütte GmbH and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-135/16)

Judgment of 25 Jul 2018law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-135-16/para_37@2026-11-10

37It follows from the foregoing that the applicants in the main proceedings undoubtedly had standing to seek the annulment of the contested decision.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-135/16 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:582
Decided: 25 Jul 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main (Higher Regional Court, Frankfurt am Main, Germany)
Applicants: Georgsmarienhütte GmbH; Stahlwerk Bous GmbH; Schmiedag GmbH; Harz Guss Zorge GmbH
Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Rapporteur: J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Advocate General: M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona
Bench: 11 judges
K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, M. Ilešič, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, A. Rosas, J. Malenovský, E. Juhász, A. Borg Barthet, D. Šváby, A. Prechal, C. Lycourgos
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0135

Topics

State aid Transport

History · 1 version

25 Jul 2018Reading

Connections

Cited by 15: Vitol SA v Belgische Staat (C-268/22); WhatsApp Ireland Ltd v European Data Protection Board (C-97/23 P); Scai Srl v Regione Campania (C-588/23); European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (C-516/22); Magyar Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal (MEKH) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-684/19); Vítkovice Steel a.s. v Ministerstvo životního prostředí (C-524/20)2 provisions; Oltchim SA v European Commission (T-565/19)5 provisions; Wepa Hygieneprodukte GmbH and Others v European Commission (T-238/19); Covestro Deutschland AG v European Commission (T-745/18)2 provisions; Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. KG and Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission (T-233/19); AZ v European Commission (T-196/19); Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation v Compagnie des pêches de Saint-Malo (C-212/19)4 provisions; CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd v European Commission (T-399/16); Iccrea Banca SpA Istituto Centrale del Credito Cooperativo v Banca d'Italia (C-414/18); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-405/16 P)
Cites 19: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; PJSC Rosneft Oil Company v Her Majesty's Treasury and Others (C-72/15); Masterfoods Ltd v HB Ice Cream Ltd (C-344/98); Stichting Woonlinie and Others v European Commission (C-133/12 P); Comitato «Venezia vuole vivere», Hotel Cipriani Srl and Società Italiana per il gas SpA (Italgas) v European Commission (C-71/09 P, C-73/09 P, C-76/09 P); Bolton Alimentari SpA v Agenzia delle Dogane - Ufficio delle Dogane di Alessandria (C-494/09); A and Others v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken (C-158/14); TWD Textilwerke Deggendorf GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-188/92); Nachi Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld (C-239/99); Commission of the European Communities v Koninklijke FrieslandCampina NV (C-519/07); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-298/00 P); Italian Republic and Sardegna Lines - Servizi Marittimi della Sardegna SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-15/98, C-105/99); Estado português v Banco Privado Português SA and Massa Insolvente do Banco Privado Português SA (C-667/13); Avis au titre de l'article 300, paragraphe 6, CE (Opinion 1/09); Criminal proceedings against E and F (C-550/09); Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (notified under document C(2014) 8786) (Text with EEA relevance); A2A SpA, formerly AEM SpA v European Commission (C-320/09); Plaumann & Co. v Commission of the European Economic Community (C-25/62); 88/591/ECSC, EEC, Euratom: Council Decision of 24 October 1988 establishing a Court of First Instance of the European Communities