Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
British Airways plc v European Commission (C-122/16 P)
Judgment
The appeal
Substance
Findings of the Court
91

British Airways plc v European Commission (C-122/16 P)

Judgment of 14 Nov 2017law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-122-16/para_91@2026-11-10

91In the present case, as indicated in paragraphs 20 and 21 above, in the form of order set out in its originating application before the General Court, the appellant sought only a partial annulment of the decision at issue.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-122/16 P · ECLI:EU:C:2017:861
Decided: 14 Nov 2017
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: British Airways plc
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: E. Regan
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 15 judges
K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, R. Silva de Lapuerta, M. Ilešič, L. Bay-Larsen, J. Malenovský, E. Levits, E. Juhász, A. Borg Barthet, J.–C. Bonichot, F. Biltgen, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos, M. Vilaras, E. Regan
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0122

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

14 Nov 2017Reading

Connections

Cited by 22: Vitol SA v Belgische Staat (C-268/22); Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission (C-379/22 P); European Commission v Zippo Manufacturing Co. and Zippo GmbH (C-811/23 P); LE v European Commission (C-781/22); European Commission v Intel Corporation Inc (C-240/22 P); Silgan Holdings, Inc. and Others v European Commission (T-589/22); Fachverband Spielhallen eV and LM v European Commission (C-831/21 P); European Parliament v Giulia Moi (C-246/21); British Airways plc v European Commission (T-341/17)3 provisions; Council of the European Union v Hamas (C-833/19 P); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (C-106/20); Škoda Investement a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-712/20); Inclusion Alliance for Europe GEIE v European Commission (C-378/16 P); European External Action Service (EEAS) v Ruben Alba Aguilera and Others (C-427/18 P); Printeos, SA and Others v European Commission (T-466/17); George Haswani v Council of the European Union (C-313/17 P); Republic of Estonia v European Commission (C-334/17); Mass Response Service GmbH v European Commission (T-885/16); Multiconnect GmbH v European Commission (T-884/16); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-114/17 P); Société des produits Nestlé SA and Others v Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd (C-84/17 P, C-85/17 P, C-95/17 P); mobile.de GmbH, anciennement mobile.international GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-418/16 P)
Cites 24: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Stichting Al-Aqsa v Council of the European Union and Kingdom of the Netherlands v Stichting Al-Aqsa (C-539/10 P, C-550/10 P); European Commission v Ireland and Others (C-89/08); 2002/309/EC,Euratom: Decision of the Council, and of the Commission as regards the Agreement on Scientific and Technological Cooperation, of 4 April 2002 on the conclusion of seven Agreements with the Swiss Confederation; SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission (T-56/11); Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission (T-39/11); Martinair Holland NV v European Commission (T-67/11); Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission (T-28/11); Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v European Commission (T-38/11); Japan Airlines Co. Ltd, formerly Japan Airlines International Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-36/11); Deutsche Lufthansa AG and Others v European Commission (T-46/11); Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission (T-43/11); British Airways plc v European Commission (T-48/11); Latam Airlines Group SA, formerly Lan Airlines SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission (T-40/11); Air France-KLM v European Commission (T-62/11); Société Air France SA v European Commission (T-63/11); Air Canada v European Commission (T-9/11); KME Germany AG, KME France SAS and KME Italy SpA v European Commission (C-389/10 P); Comunità montana della Valnerina v Commission of the European Communities (C-240/03 P); Commission of the European Communities v AssiDomän Kraft Products AB, Iggesunds Bruk AB, Korsnäs AB, MoDo Paper AB, Södra Cell AB, Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags AB and Svenska Cellulosa AB (C-310/97 P); Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon v European Commission (C-386/10 P); Michel Jamet v European Commission (37/71)