Kenup Foundation and Others v European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (T-76/15)

Judgment of 18 Jan 2018

law://eu/cjeu/2015/t-76-15/para_54@2026-11-13

54Finally, Article 15 of Regulation 290/2013 provides that ‘the proposals submitted shall be evaluated on the basis of [various] award criteria[, namely,] excellence[,] impact [and] quality and efficiency of the implementation’, that ‘[the] proposals shall be ranked according to the evaluation results’, and that ‘the evaluation shall be carried out by independent experts’. Article 40 of that regulation also provides that ‘the Commission and, where appropriate, funding bodies may appoint independent experts to evaluate proposals in accordance with Article 15 or to advise on or assist with [...] the evaluation of proposals [...]’.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court
Case: T-76/15 · ECLI:EU:T:2018:9
Decided: 18 Jan 2018
Applicants: Kenup Foundation; Candena GmbH and 3 more
CO BIK Center odličnosti za biosenzoriko, instrumentacijo in procesno kontrolo; Evotec AG; represented initially by U. Soltész, C. Wagner, H. Weiß and A. Richter, subsequently by U. Soltész, H. Weiß and A. Richter and finally by U. Soltész and H. Weiß, lawyers
Defendant: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)
Bench: 3 judges
V. Tomljenović, A. Marcoulli, A. Kornezov
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015TJ0076

History · 1 version

18 Jan 2018Reading

Connections

See on a map

Cited by 3: Radical-Consulting UG and Others v European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (T-328/23); Universität Bremen v European Research Executive Agency (T-660/19); Transtec v European Commission (T-228/18)
Cites 1: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 290/2013