Bureau d'achat de diamant Centrafrique (Badica) and Kardiam v Council of the European Union (T-619/15)

Judgment of 20 Jul 2017

law://eu/cjeu/2015/t-619-15/para_99@2026-11-14

99Such an assessment must be carried out by examining the evidence and information not in isolation but in its context. The Council discharges the burden of proof borne by it if it presents to the EU Courts a set of indicia sufficiently specific, precise and consistent to establish that there is a sufficient link between the entity subject to a measure freezing its funds and the regime or, in general, the situations, being combated (see judgment of 21 April 2015, Anbouba v Council, C‑605/13 P, EU:C:2015:248, paragraphs 51 and 53 and the case-law cited).

Bureau d'achat de diamant Centrafrique (Badica) and Kardiam v Council of the European Union (T-619/15)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections