Bureau d'achat de diamant Centrafrique (Badica) and Kardiam v Council of the European Union (T-619/15)

Judgment of 20 Jul 2017

law://eu/cjeu/2015/t-619-15/para_89@2026-11-14

89In those circumstances, the Council cannot be criticised, in the present case, for having failed to obtain from the Sanctions Committee information or evidence in support of the allegations made against the applicants and for having, therefore, according to the applicants, ‘quasi mechanically transposed’ that listing measure, without examining the facts and circumstances underlying it (see, to that effect, judgment of 13 December 2016, Al-Ghabra v Commission, T‑248/13, EU:T:2016:721, paragraph 76).

Bureau d'achat de diamant Centrafrique (Badica) and Kardiam v Council of the European Union (T-619/15)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections