Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Iran Insurance Company v Council of the European Union (T-558/15)
III. Law
D. Substance
2. The alleged damage and the existenc…
(b)The material damage allegedly suffe…
(1)The evidential value of the SRA rep…
154

Iran Insurance Company v Council of the European Union (T-558/15)

law://eu/cjeu/2015/t-558-15/para_154@2026-11-12

Key facts

Court: General Court · First Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-558/15 · ECLI:EU:T:2018:945
Decided: 13 Dec 2018
Procedure: Action for damages
Applicant: Iran Insurance Company
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: I. Pelikánová
Bench: 5 judges
I. Pelikánová, V. Valančius, P. Nihoul, J. Svenningsen, U. Öberg
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015TJ0558

Topics

Common foreign and security policy Law governing the institutions

History · 1 version

13 Dec 2018Reading

Judgment of 13 Dec 2018

154In order to establish the evidential value of a document, it is necessary to take account of several factors, such as the origin of the document, the circumstances in which it was drawn up, the person to whom it was addressed and its content, and whether, according to those aspects, the information it contains appears sound and reliable (judgments of 15 March 2000, Cimenteries CBR and Others v Commission, T‑25/95, T‑26/95, T‑30/95 to T‑32/95, T‑34/95 to T‑39/95, T‑42/95 to T‑46/95, T‑48/95, T‑50/95 to T‑65/95, T‑68/95 to T‑71/95, T‑87/95, T‑88/95, T‑103/95 and T‑104/95, EU:T:2000:77, paragraph 1838, and of 7 November 2002, Vela and Tecnagrid v Commission, T‑141/99, T‑142/99, T‑150/99 and T‑151/99, EU:T:2002:270, paragraph 223).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 5: Alexander Dmitrievich Pumpyanskiy v Council of the European Union (T-369/24); Abdelkader Sabra v Council of the European Union (T-249/20)2 provisions; Marián Kočner v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (T-528/20); Tilly-Sabco v Council of the European Union and European Commission (T-707/18); Post Bank Iran v Council of the European Union (T-559/15)2 provisions
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Safa Nicu Sepahan Co. v Council of the European Union (C-45/15 P); Julien Dufour v European Central Bank (T-436/09); Safa Nicu Sepahan Co. v Council of the European Union (T-384/11); Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012; 2010/413/CFSP: Council Decision of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP; Idromacchine Srl, Alessandro Capuzzo and Roberto Capuzzo v European Commission (T-88/09); SELEX Sistemi Integrati SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-481/07); Comité International de la Rayonne et des Fibres Synthétiques and others v Commission of the European Communities (C-313/90); Biogena Naturprodukte GmbH & Co KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-236/16); Abdulbasit Abdulrahim v Council of the European Union and European Commission (C-239/12 P); Sofiane Fahas v Council of the European Union (T-49/07); Inalca SpA — Industria Alimentari Carni and Cremonini SpA v European Commission (C-460/09 P); Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (C-469/11 P); Jose Maria Sison v Council of the European Union (T-341/07); Bretagne Angleterre Irlande (BAI) v Commission of the European Communities (T-230/95); Pilar Angé Serrano and Others v European Parliament (T-47/05); Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (T-297/12); Panteleïmon Zafeiropoulos v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (T-537/12)