Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
NeXovation, Inc. v European Commission (T-353/15)
I. Background to the dispute
B. The contested decisions
14

NeXovation, Inc. v European Commission (T-353/15)

law://eu/cjeu/2015/t-353-15/para_14@2026-11-14

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Connections

Interpreted by the courts in 1: NeXovation, Inc. v European Commission (C-665/19 P)
Cited by 2: INC SpA and Consorzio Stabile Sis SCpA v European Commission (T-24/19); NeXovation, Inc. v European Commission (C-665/19 P)4 provisions
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Société Régie Networks v Direction de contrôle fiscal Rhône-Alpes Bourgogne (C-333/07); Deutsche Post AG and DHL International v Commission of the European Communities (T-388/03); Mory SA and Others v European Commission (C-33/14 P); European Commission v Scott SA (C-290/07 P); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty; Chronopost SA and La Poste v Union française de l’express (UFEX) and Others (C-341/06); Plaumann & Co. v Commission of the European Economic Community (25/62); Ryanair Ltd v European Commission (C-287/12); Athinaïki Techniki AE v Commission of the European Communities (C-521/06); NDSHT Nya Destination Stockholm Hotell & Teaterpaket AB v European Commission (C-322/09 P); Portuguese Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-88/03); Commission of the European Communities v Salzgitter AG (C-408/04); Land Burgenland (C‑214/12 P), Grazer Wechselseitige Versicherung AG (C‑215/12 P) and Republic of Austria (C‑223/12 P) v European Commission (C-214/12 P, C-215/12 P, C-223/12 P); European Commission v Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG and Kronotex GmbH & Co. KG (C-83/09 P); Matra SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-225/91); British United Provident Association Ltd (BUPA), BUPA Insurance Ltd and BUPA Ireland Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-289/03); Ryanair Ltd v European Commission (T-123/09); Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P)

History · 1 version

19 Jun 2019Reading

14In the final indent of Article 1 of the final decision, the Commission determined that the sale of the Nürburgring assets to Capricorn did not constitute State aid (‘the second contested decision’).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · First Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-353/15 · ECLI:EU:T:2019:434
Decided: 19 Jun 2019
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: NeXovation, Inc
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: U. Öberg
Bench: 5 judges
I. Pelikánová, V. Valančius, P. Nihoul, J. Svenningsen, U. Öberg
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015TJ0353

Topics

Judgment of 19 Jun 2019