Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Mohamad Hamcho and Hamcho International v Council of the European Union (T-153/15)
Judgment
Background to the dispute
1. Previous procedure concerning the a…
8

Mohamad Hamcho and Hamcho International v Council of the European Union (T-153/15)

law://eu/cjeu/2015/t-153-15/para_8@2026-11-12

Key facts

Court: General Court · Seventh Chamber
Case: T-153/15 · ECLI:EU:T:2016:630
Decided: 26 Oct 2016
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: Mohamad Hamcho; Hamsho International
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: Ulloa Rubio
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015TJ0153

Topics

Common foreign and security policy

Connections

Cited by 3: BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (T-888/16); Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission (T-166/17); Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission (T-198/17)
Cites 14: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 611/2011 of 23 June 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria; Stichting Certificatie Kraanverhuurbedrijf and Federatie van Nederlandse Kraanverhuurbedrijven v Commission of the European Communities (C-268/96); Ziegler SA v European Commission (C-113/09); Giampietro Torresan v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-5/10); Geert Wilders v European Parliament and Others (T-410/14); Iranian Offshore Engineering & Construction Co. v Council of the European Union (T-110/12); Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012; Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP; Council Decision 2011/273/CFSP of 9 May 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Syria; Council Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 of 9 May 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria; Mohamad Hamcho and Hamcho International v Council of the European Union (T-43/12); Council Implementing Decision 2011/367/CFSP of 23 June 2011 implementing Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

History · 1 version

26 Oct 2016Reading

Judgment of 26 Oct 2016

8On the same day, the Council adopted Implementing Regulation (EU) No 611/2011 implementing Regulation No 442/2011 (OJ 2011 L 164, p. 1). Hamsho International’s name was placed on the list in Annex II to Regulation No 442/2011 with the same references and reasons as those set out in the annex to Implementing Decision 2011/367.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.