Judgment_paragraph 125 · Red Bull GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-101/15, T-102/15)

125According to settled case-law, the possibility of relying on the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations is open to any individual whom an institution, by giving him precise assurances, has led to entertain legitimate expectations. Regardless of the form in which it is communicated, precise, unconditional and consistent information which comes from an authorised and reliable source constitutes such assurance (see judgment of 5 April 2006, Kachakil Amar v OHIM (Longitudinal line ending with a triangle), T‑388/04, not published, paragraph 26 and the case-law cited).

Red Bull GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-101/15, T-102/15)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections