Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v TV2/Danmark A/S (C-656/15 P)
The appeal
Findings of the Court
49

European Commission v TV2/Danmark A/S (C-656/15 P)

Judgment of 9 Nov 2017law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-656-15/para_49@2026-11-10

49As stated by the General Court, in paragraph 176 of the judgment under appeal, in the years 1995 and 1996, the advertising space on TV2/Danmark was sold not by TV2/Danmark itself, but by a third company, TV2 Reklame, and the income from those sales was transferred to TV2/Danmark through the TV2 Fund.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-656/15 P · ECLI:EU:C:2017:836
Decided: 9 Nov 2017
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62011TJ0674
Applicants: European Commission; TV2/Danmark A/S
Rapporteur: R. Silva de Lapuerta
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, C.G. Fernlund, A. Arabadjiev, S. Rodin, E. Regan
Language: Danish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0656

Topics

History · 1 version

9 Nov 2017Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: TV2/Danmark A/S v European Commission (T-674/11)
Cited by 8: Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd v TV2/Danmark A/S and Kingdom of Denmark (C-445/19)3 provisions; Hacène Bezouaoui and HB Consultant v European Commission (T-478/18); Comune di Milano v European Commission (C-160/19 P); Société Eco TLC v Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire and Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances (C-556/19); FVE Holýšov I s. r. o. and Others v European Commission (T-217/17); Achema AB and Others v Valstybinė kainų ir energetikos kontrolės komisija (VKEKK) (C-706/17); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-405/16 P); Italian Republic and Others v European Commission (T-98/16, T-196/16, T-198/16)2 provisions
Cites 14: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); PreussenElektra AG v Schhleswag AG, in the presence of Windpark Reußenköge III GmbH and Land Schleswig-Holstein (C-379/98); Essent Netwerk Noord BV supported by Nederlands Elektriciteit Administratiekantoor BV v Aluminium Delfzijl BV, and in the indemnification proceedings Aluminium Delfzijl BV v Staat der Nederlanden and in the indemnification proceedings Essent Netwerk Noord BV v Nederlands Elektriciteit Administratiekantoor BV and Saranne BV (C-206/06); French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-482/99); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-173/73); Association Vent De Colère! Fédération nationale and Others v Ministre de l’Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement and Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie (C-262/12); TV 2/Danmark A/S and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-309/04); Elcogás SA v Administración del Estado and Iberdrola SA (C-275/13); 2011/839/EU: Commission Decision of 20 April 2011 on the measures implemented by Denmark (C 2/03) for TV2/Danmark (notified under document C(2011) 2612) Text with EEA relevance; TV2/Danmark A/S v European Commission (T-674/11); 2005/217/EC: Commission Decision of 19 May 2004 on measures implemented by Denmark for TV2/Danmark (notified under document number C(2004) 1814) (Text with EEA relevance); Doux Élevage SNC and Coopérative agricole UKL-ARREE v Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Alimentation, de la Pêche, de la Ruralité et de l’Aménagement du territoire and Comité interprofessionnel de la dinde française (CIDEF) (C-677/11); Italian Republic and SIM 2 Multimedia SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-328/99, C-399/00); Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, and Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht (C-280/00)