Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Furkan Tekdemir v Kreis Bergstraße (C-652/15)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
39

Furkan Tekdemir v Kreis Bergstraße (C-652/15)

Judgment of 29 Mar 2017law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-652-15/para_39@2026-11-10

39In those circumstances, as the Advocate General stated in paragraph 17 of his Opinion, the objective of efficient management of migration flows may constitute an overriding reason in the public interest capable of justifying a new restriction within the meaning of Article 13 of Decision No 1/80.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-652/15 · ECLI:EU:C:2017:239
Decided: 29 Mar 2017
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt (Administrative Court, Darmstadt, Germany)
Applicant: Furkan Tekdemir
Defendant: Kreis Bergstraße
Rapporteur: R. Silva de Lapuerta
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, C.G. Fernlund, S. Rodin
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0652

Topics

Association agreements Freedom of movement for workers

History · 1 version

29 Mar 2017Reading

Connections

Cited by 4: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v A and Others (C-70/18); Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid and Others v S and Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-402/21); A v Udlændinge- og Integrationsministeriet (C-89/18)2 provisions; Nefiye Yön v Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart (C-123/17)3 provisions
Cites 6: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Caner Genc v Integrationsministeriet (C-561/14); 64/732/EEC: Council Decision of 23 December 1963 on the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey; 80/1/EEC: Commission Decision of 7 December 1979 for the resolution of the dispute between the Kingdom of Denmark and the other Member States over the publication of reference tariffs for the cross-frontier carriage of goods by road; C. Demir v Staatssecretaris van Justitie (C-225/12); Furkan Tekdemir v Kreis Bergstraße (C-652/15)