Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Stichting Brein v Ziggo BV and XS4All Internet BV (C-610/15)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
29

Stichting Brein v Ziggo BV and XS4All Internet BV (C-610/15)

Judgment of 14 Jun 2017law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-610-15/para_29@2026-11-12

29Finally, the Court has underlined, on numerous occasions, that the profit-making nature of a communication, within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29, is not irrelevant (judgment of 26 April 2017, Stichting Brein, C‑527/15, EU:C:2017:300, paragraph 34 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-610/15 · ECLI:EU:C:2017:456
Decided: 14 Jun 2017
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supreme Court of the Netherlands)
Applicant: Stichting Brein
Defendants: Ziggo BV; XS4ALL Internet BV
Rapporteur: M. Ilešič
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, A. Prechal, A. Rosas, C. Toader, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0610

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services Intellectual, industrial and commercial property

History · 1 version

14 Jun 2017Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2001/29/EC2 provisions
Cited by 10: Frank Peterson v Google LLC and Others and Elsevier Inc.v Cyando AG (C-682/18, C-683/18)2 provisions; Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers v Tom Kabinet Internet BV and Others (C-263/18); Blue Air Aviation SA v UCMR – ADA Asociaţia pentru Drepturi de Autor a Compozitorilor and Uniunea Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (UPFR) v Societatea Naţională de Transport Feroviar de Călători (SNTFC) 'CFR Călători' SA (C-775/21); Mircom International Content Management & Consulting (M.I.C.M.) Limited v Telenet BVBA (C-597/19)2 provisions; Föreningen Svenska Tonsättares Internationella Musikbyrå u.p.a. (Stim) and Svenska artisters och musikers intresseorganisation ek. för. (SAMI) v Fleetmanager Sweden AB and Nordisk Biluthyrning AB (C-753/18); Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte eV (GEMA) v GL (C-135/23); BY v CX (C-637/19); Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Dirk Renckhoff (C-161/17); VG Bild-Kunst v Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz (C-392/19); Ocilion IPTV Technologies GmbH v Seven.One Entertainment Group GmbH and Puls 4 TV GmbH & Co. KG (C-426/21)2 provisions
Cites 6: Directive 2001/29/EC2 provisions; Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (Text with EEA relevance); GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV and Others (C-160/15); Nils Svensson and Others v Retriever Sverige AB (C-466/12); Stichting Brein v Jack Frederik Wullems (C-527/15)2 provisions; BestWater International GmbH v Michael Mebes and Stefan Potsch (C-348/13)