Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Alexios Anagnostakis v European Commission (C-589/15 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The first ground of appeal, alleging a…
Findings of the Court
25

Alexios Anagnostakis v European Commission (C-589/15 P)

Judgment of 12 Sept 2017law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-589-15/para_25@2026-11-12

25In accordance with the first paragraph of Article 24 TFEU, the procedures and conditions for submitting an ECI have been specified in Regulation No 211/2011. Article 4 of that regulation lays down the conditions for the Commission to register a proposed ECI.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-589/15 P · ECLI:EU:C:2017:663
Decided: 12 Sept 2017
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Alexios Anagnostakis
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: S. Rodin
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 13 judges
K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, R. Silva de Lapuerta, M. Ilešič, L. Bay Larsen, E. Juhász, M. Berger, A. Prechal, A. Rosas, J. Malenovský, D. Šváby, S. Rodin, C. Lycourgos
Language: Greek
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0589

Topics

Economic and monetary policy

History · 1 version

12 Sept 2017Reading

Connections

Cited by 16: Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB v European Commission (C-621/23 P); Fachverband Eisenhüttenschlacken eV v European Commission (T-560/22); Romania v European Commission (C-54/22 P); IFIC Holding AG v European Commission (T-8/21); PAO Severstal and Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) v European Commission (C-747/21 P); Romania v European Commission (C-899/19 P); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (C-107/20); Romania v European Commission (T-495/19); Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario) v Council of the European Union (T-279/19); Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza Chłodnictwa i Klimatyzacji v European Commission (T-126/19); Iniciativa ciudadana « Derecho de la UE, derechos de las minorías y democratización de las instituciones españolas » v European Commission (T-611/19); Tom Moerenhout and Others v European Commission (T-789/19); Patrick Grégor Puppinck and Others v European Commission (C-418/18 P); Romania v European Commission (T-391/17)2 provisions; Balázs-Árpád Izsák and Attila Dabis v European Commission (C-420/16 P); European Union Intellectual Property Office v European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Others (C-677/15 P)
Cites 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)24 provisions