Judgment_paragraph 42 · Glencore Céréales France v Établissement national des produits de l'agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer) (C-584/15)

42Consequently, the answer to the second question is that the second subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Regulation No 2988/95 must be interpreted as meaning that the fact that an operator is liable for claims for interest, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, does not constitute a ‘continuous or repeated irregularity’, within the meaning of that provision. Such claims must be regarded as resulting from the same irregularity, within the meaning of Article 1(1) of Regulation No 2988/95, as that giving rise to the recovery of the aid and amounts wrongly received, constituting the principal claims.

Glencore Céréales France v Établissement national des produits de l'agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer) (C-584/15)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections