Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Stichting Brein v Jack Frederik Wullems (C-527/15)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The first and second questions
38

Stichting Brein v Jack Frederik Wullems (C-527/15)

Judgment of 26 Apr 2017law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-527-15/para_38@2026-11-12

38That is also the case for the sale of a multimedia player, such as that at issue in the main proceedings.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-527/15 · ECLI:EU:C:2017:300
Decided: 26 Apr 2017
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Rechtbank Midden-Nederland (District Court of Central Netherlands, Netherlands)
Applicant: Stichting Brein
Defendant: Jack Frederik Wullems
Rapporteur: M. Ilešič
Advocate General: M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, K. Lenaerts, A. Prechal, C. Toader, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0527

Topics

Approximation of laws

History · 1 version

26 Apr 2017Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2001/29/EC4 provisions
Cited by 2: Peter Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky and Kriminálny úrad finančnej správy (C-73/16); Stichting Brein v Ziggo BV and XS4All Internet BV (C-610/15)2 provisions
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2001/29/EC; Microsoft Mobile Sales International Oy and Others v Ministero per i beni e le attività culturali (MiBAC) and Others (C-110/15); Reha Training Gesellschaft für Sport- und Unfallrehabilitation mbH v Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte eV (GEMA) (C-117/15); Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE) v Rafael Hoteles SA (C-306/05); Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening (C-5/08); Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Limited v Ireland and Attorney General (C-162/10); GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV and Others (C-160/15); Società Consortile Fonografici (SCF) v Marco Del Corso (C-135/10); Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (C-403/08, C-429/08); OSA — Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s (C-351/12); ITV Broadcasting Ltd and Others v TVCatchUp Ltd (C-607/11); ACI Adam BV and Others v Stichting de Thuiskopie and Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding (C-435/12); Nils Svensson and Others v Retriever Sverige AB (C-466/12); Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others (C-360/13); Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening (C-302/10); BestWater International GmbH v Michael Mebes and Stefan Potsch (C-348/13)