Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Rainer Typke v European Commission (C-491/15 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The first ground of appeal
–Findings of the Court
38

Rainer Typke v European Commission (C-491/15 P)

Judgment of 11 Jan 2017law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-491-15/para_38@2026-11-11

38It follows that the institutions, to satisfy the requirements of Regulation No 1049/2001, may be led to establish a document from information contained in a database by using existing search tools.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-491/15 P · ECLI:EU:C:2017:5
Decided: 11 Jan 2017
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Rainer Typke
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: J.-C. Bonichot
Advocate General: M. Bobek
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, C.G. Fernlund, S. Rodin
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0491

Topics

Access to documents

History · 1 version

11 Jan 2017Reading

Connections

Cited by 12: Compass-Datenbank GmbH v European Commission (T-594/24); eClear AG v European Commission (T-127/23); British American Tobacco Polska Trading sp. z o.o. v European Commission (T-311/23); Herbert Smith Freehills LLP v European Commission (T-570/22); XC v European Commission (C-527/21); Kedrion SpA v European Medicines Agency (T-570/20); XC v European Commission (T-488/18); Franklin Dehousse v Court of Justice of the European Union (T-857/19); Luisa Izuzquiza and Arne Semsrott v European Border and Coast Guard Agency (T-31/18)2 provisions; Lubrizol France SAS v Council of the European Union (C-223/17); Verein Deutsche Sprache eV v European Commission (T-468/16); Telefónica SA v European Commission (C-487/16)
Cites 5: Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; Borealis Polyolefine GmbH and Others v Bundesminister für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft and Others (C-191/14, C-192/14, C-295/14, C-389/14, C-391/14, C-392/14, C-393/14); Guido Strack v European Commission (C-127/13 P); Julien Dufour v European Central Bank (T-436/09); Rainer Typke v European Commission (T-214/13)