Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Jean-Michel Adrien and Others v Premier ministre and Others (C-466/15)
Judgment
Consideration of the question referred
37

Jean-Michel Adrien and Others v Premier ministre and Others (C-466/15)

Judgment of 6 Oct 2016law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-466-15/para_37@2026-11-11

37Accordingly, it is not necessary to rule on the interpretation of Article 48 TFEU or of Article 4(3) TEU.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-466/15 · ECLI:EU:C:2016:749
Decided: 6 Oct 2016
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Conseil d’État (France)
Applicant: Jean-Michel Adrien and Others
Defendants: Prime Minister; Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics; Ministre de la Décentralisation et de la Fonction publique
Rapporteur: T. von Danwitz
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 5 judges
T. von Danwitz, C. Lycourgos, E. Juhász, C. Vajda, K. Jürimäe
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0466

Topics

Freedom of movement for workers Social security

History · 1 version

6 Oct 2016Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 12: Wenceslas de Lobkowicz v Ministère des Finances et des Comptes publics (C-690/15); OQ v European Commission (T-713/20); YY and ZA v Court of Justice of the European Union (T-545/16); YT and YU v European Commission (T-532/16); YV and Others v European Commission (T-533/16); Vasile Dumitrescu and Guido Schwarz v European Commission (T-531/16); Claudio Necci v European Commission (T-129/19); PF and QG v Caisse d’allocations familiales d’Ille et Vilaine (CAF) (C-27/20); DQ v Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire and Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics (C-903/19); José Barroso Truta and Others v Court of Justice of the European Union (T-702/16 P)2 provisions; DW v Valsts sociālās apdrošināšanas aģentūra (C-651/16)2 provisions; Criminal proceedings against U (C-420/15)2 provisions
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; European Commission v Republic of Cyprus (C-515/14); Maurits Casteels v British Airways plc (C-379/09); Simone Gardella v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) (C-233/12); Government of the French Community and Walloon Government v Flemish Government (C-212/06); G. B. C. Echternach and A. Moritz v Minister van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen (389/87, 390/87); Amy Rockler v Försäkringskassan (C-137/04); Council Regulation (EU) No 1240/2010 of 20 December 2010 adjusting, from 1 July 2010 , the rate of contribution to the pension scheme of officials and other servants of the European Union; Edgard Mulders v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen (C-548/11); Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials); Teresa and Silvana Petroni v Office national des pensions pour travailleurs salariés (ONPTS), Bruxelles (24/75); European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-317/14)