Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Asociación Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain, SL (C-434/15)
Consideration of the questions referred
Admissibility
28

Asociación Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain, SL (C-434/15)

Judgment of 20 Dec 2017law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-434-15/para_28@2026-11-11

28Lastly, in accordance with Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure, the referring court sets out precisely the reasons for its uncertainty as to the interpretation of EU law.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-434/15 · ECLI:EU:C:2017:981
Decided: 20 Dec 2017
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 3 de Barcelona (Commercial Court No 3, Barcelona, Spain)
Applicant: Asociación Profesional Élite Taxi
Defendant: Uber Systems Spain SL
Rapporteur: D. Šváby
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 13 judges
K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, R. Silva de Lapuerta, M. Ilešič, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, J. Malenovský, E. Levits, E. Juhász, A. Borg Barthet, D. Šváby, C. Lycourgos, M. Vilaras, E. Regan
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0434

Topics

Approximation of laws Consumer protection Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services Internal market - Principles

History · 1 version

20 Dec 2017Reading

Connections

Interprets 5: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Directive 2006/123/EC2 provisions; Directive 2000/31/EC; Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations; Directive 98/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 1998 amending Directive 98/34/EC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations
Cited by 12: Criminal proceedings against X (C-390/18); NP v Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin (C-232/20); Administración General del Estado and Others v Asociación para la Defensa de los Intereses Comunes de las Autoescuelas (AUDICA) and Ministerio Fiscal (C-292/21); Doctipharma SAS v Union des Groupements de pharmaciens d’officine (UDGPO) and Pictime Coreyre (C-606/21)4 provisions; FMS and Others v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság and Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság (C-924/19 PPU, C-925/19 PPU)2 provisions; Associação Peço a Palavra and Others v Conselho de Ministros (C-563/17); Criminal proceedings against Uber France (C-320/16)2 provisions; European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark (C-167/22); Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-626/18); Hungary v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-620/18); Star Taxi App SRL v Unitatea Administrativ Teritorială Municipiul Bucureşti prin Primar General and Consiliul General al Municipiului Bucureşti (C-62/19)5 provisions; Helga Krüsemann and Others v TUIfly GmbH (C-195/17, C-197/17, C-226/17, C-228/17, C-254/17, C-274/17, C-278/17, C-290/17)
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Directive 2006/123/EC; Directive 2000/31/EC; Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations; Grupo Itevelesa SL and Others v Oca Inspección Técnica de Vehículos SA and Generalidad de Cataluña (C-168/14); R.L. Trijber v College van Burgemeester en Wethouders van Amsterdam and J. Harmsen v Burgemeester van Amsterdam (C-340/14, C-341/14); Yellow Cab Verkehrsbetriebs GmbH v Landeshauptmann von Wien (C-338/09); Congregación de Escuelas Pías Provincia Betania v Ayuntamiento de Getafe (C-74/16); Banif Plus Bank Zrt. v Márton Lantos and Mártonné Lantos (C-312/14); Wenceslas de Lobkowicz v Ministère des Finances et des Comptes publics (C-690/15); Pillbox 38 (UK) Limited, trading as Totally Wicked v Secretary of State for Health (C-477/14); Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU (Opinion 2/15)