Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Home Credit Slovakia a.s. v Klára Bíróová (C-42/15)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The fifth and sixth questions
54

Home Credit Slovakia a.s. v Klára Bíróová (C-42/15)

Judgment of 9 Nov 2016law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-42-15/para_54@2026-11-12

54In view of the clear wording of those provisions, it must be found that Directive 2008/48 does not impose an obligation to include in the credit agreement such a statement of account in the form of an amortisation table.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-42/15 · ECLI:EU:C:2016:842
Decided: 9 Nov 2016
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Okresný súd Dunajská Streda (District Court, Dunajská Streda, Slovakia)
Applicant: Home Credit Slovakia, a.s.
Defendant: Klára Bíróová
Rapporteur: M. Safjan
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 5 judges
L. Bay Larsen, M. Vilaras, J. Malenovský, M. Safjan, D. Šváby
Language: Slovak
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0042

Topics

Approximation of laws Consumer protection

History · 1 version

9 Nov 2016Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC
Interpreted by the courts in 2: LH v Profi Credit Slovakia s.r.o (C-485/19); TE v Pohotovosť s.r.o (C-331/18)
Cited by 12: LH v Profi Credit Slovakia s.r.o (C-485/19)7 provisions; VK and Others v BMW Bank GmbH and Others (C-38/21); S.R.G. v Profi Credit Bulgaria EOOD (C-714/22); UK and Others v Volkswagen Bank GmbH and Others (C-33/20); TE v Pohotovosť s.r.o (C-331/18)8 provisions; OPR-Finance s.r.o. v GK (C-679/18); Ultimo Portfolio Investment (Luxembourg) S.A. v KM (C-303/20); Z. sp. z o.o. v A. S.A (C-326/22); JC v Kreissparkasse Saarlouis (C-66/19); Lexitor sp. z o.o. v A. B. S.A (C-472/23); A. B. and F. B. v Slovenská sporiteľňa a.s (C-677/23); RN v Home Credit Slovakia a.s (C-290/19)
Cites 10: Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts - Statement by the Council and the Parliament re Article 6 (1) - Statement by the Commission re Article 3 (1), first indent; Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC; Content Services Ltd v Bundesarbeitskammer (C-49/11); Ernst Georg Radlinger and Helena Radlingerová v Finway a.s (C-377/14); SC Volksbank România SA v Autoritatea Naţională pentru Protecţia Consumatorilor — Comisariatul Judeţean pentru Protecţia Consumatorilor Călăraşi (CJPC) (C-602/10); Maria Bucura v SC Bancpost SA (C-348/14); Pohotovosť s.r.o. v Iveta Korčkovská (C-76/10); CA Consumer Finance SA v Ingrid Bakkaus and Others (C-449/13); Council Directive 87/102/EEC of 22 December 1986 for the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning consumer credit; LCL Le Crédit Lyonnais SA v Fesih Kalhan (C-565/12)