Judgment_paragraph 51 · Home Credit Slovakia a.s. v Klára Bíróová (C-42/15)

51By its fifth and sixth questions, which it is appropriate to consider together, the referring court asks, in essence, whether Article 10(2)(h) and (i) of Directive 2008/48 must be interpreted as meaning that a fixed-term credit agreement providing for amortisation of the capital in consecutive instalments must state, in the form of an amortisation table, the part of each instalment that will be allocated to repayment of the capital and, if not, whether, in the light of Article 22(1) of the directive, those provisions preclude a Member State from imposing such an obligation under national law.

Home Credit Slovakia a.s. v Klára Bíróová (C-42/15)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections