Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Hungary (C-392/15)
Judgment
The action
Findings of the Court
98

European Commission v Hungary (C-392/15)

Judgment of 1 Feb 2017law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-392-15/para_98@2026-11-11

98Hungary argues that the notarial profession cannot be regarded as an economic activity and that, consequently, it does not fall within the scope of Article 49 TFEU.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-392/15 · ECLI:EU:C:2017:73
Decided: 1 Feb 2017
Procedure: Infringement action
Applicant: European Commission
Defendant: Hungary
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, E. Regan, J.‑C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, S. Rodin
Language: Hungarian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0392

Topics

Freedom of establishment

History · 1 version

1 Feb 2017Reading

Connections

Cited by 5: Pula Parking d.o.o. v Sven Klaus Tederahn (C-551/15); Lietuvos notarų rūmai and Others v Lietuvos Respublikos konkurencijos taryba (C-128/21)2 provisions; Farmacija, d.o.o. v Občina Benedikt (C-715/23); European Commission v Czech Republic (C-575/16); Trustees of the P Panayi Accumulation & Maintenance Settlements v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (C-646/15)
Cites 23: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012; Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure; Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims; Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (C-438/08); European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-47/08); European Commission v Republic of Austria (C-53/08); Albert Anker, Klaas Ras and Albertus Snoek v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-47/02); Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-404/05); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (C-114/97); Jean Reyners v Belgian State (2/74); European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-157/09); European Commission v Republic of Latvia (C-151/14); European Commission v French Republic (C-50/08); European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxemburg (C-51/08); Aldona Malgorzata Jany and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie (C-268/99); Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (C-393/05); Servizi Ausiliari Dottori Commercialisti Srl v Giuseppe Calafiori (C-451/03); Adrianus Thijssen v Controledienst voor de verzekeringen (C-42/92); European Commission v Hellenic Republic (C-61/08); Unibank A/S v Flemming G. Christensen (C-260/97); European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (C-54/08)