Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
French Republic v European Commission (C-373/15 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The third plea in law
Findings of the Court
95

French Republic v European Commission (C-373/15 P)

Judgment of 26 Jan 2017law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-373-15/para_95@2026-11-12

95It is common ground that the on-the-spot checks to be carried out in respect of CANH fall within the scope of Article 12 of Regulation No 1975/2006.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Eighth Chamber
Case: C-373/15 P · ECLI:EU:C:2017:55
Decided: 26 Jan 2017
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62013TJ0259
Applicant: French Republic
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: M. Vilaras
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 3 judges
M. Vilaras, J. Malenovský, M. Safjan
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0373

Topics

Agricultural funds

History · 1 version

26 Jan 2017Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: French Republic v European Commission (T-259/13)
Cited by 3: French Republic v European Commission (T-156/15); French Republic v European Commission (T-518/15)4 provisions; Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-143/15)
Cites 13: Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD); Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001; SELEX Sistemi Integrati SpA v Commission of the European Communities and Organisation européenne pour la sécurité de la navigation aérienne (Eurocontrol) (C-113/07); Commission Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 of 21 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the accreditation of paying agencies and other bodies and the clearance of the accounts of the EAGF and of the EAFRD; Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (C-8/88); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-192/13 P); Commission of the European Communities v Camar Srl and Tico Srl (C-312/00 P); Commission Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 of 7 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, as regards the implementation of control procedures as well as cross-compliance in respect of rural development support measures; Commission Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 of 21 April 2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of cross-compliance, modulation and the integrated administration and control system provided for in of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers; 2013/123/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 26 February 2013 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2013) 981); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-549/12 P, C-54/13 P); French Republic v European Commission (T-259/13); Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (C-418/06)