Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
TDC A/S v Teleklagenævnet and Erhvervs- og Vækstministeriet (C-327/15)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The ninth question
89

TDC A/S v Teleklagenævnet and Erhvervs- og Vækstministeriet (C-327/15)

Judgment of 21 Dec 2016law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-327-15/para_89@2026-11-11

89In that regard, it must be noted that such a time limit constitutes a procedural requirement for the submission of an application intended to ensure the exercise of a right which the party concerned draws from EU law, namely the right to compensation for the provision of a universal service.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-327/15 · ECLI:EU:C:2016:974
Decided: 21 Dec 2016
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Østre Landsret (Eastern Regional Court, Denmark)
Applicant: TDC A/S
Defendants: Teleklagenævnet; Erhvervs- og Vækstministeriet
Rapporteur: E. Jarašiūnas
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, A. Prechal, A. Rosas, C. Toader, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: Danish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0327

Topics

Information and Communications Technology Principles of Union law

History · 1 version

21 Dec 2016Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive)
Cited by 5: Eircom Limited v Commission for Communications Regulation (C-494/21); Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) v LM and Others (C-447/20); B and Others v Administration des contributions directes (C-749/18)2 provisions; TK and Others v Land Sachsen-Anhalt (C-773/18, C-774/18, C-775/18); INEOS Köln GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-572/16)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)8 provisions; Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive); Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive); Fallimento Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (C-140/09); Maribel Dominguez v Centre informatique du Centre Ouest Atlantique and Préfet de la région Centre (C-282/10); Francisco Javier Rosado Santana v Consejería de Justicia y Administración Pública de la Junta de Andalucía (C-177/10); Český telekomunikační úřad v T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s. and Vodafone Czech Republic a.s (C-508/14); Base Company NV and Mobistar NV v Ministerraad (C-1/14); Q-Beef NV v Belgische Staat and Frans Bosschaert v Belgische Staat, Vleesgroothandel Georges Goossens en Zonen NV and Slachthuizen Goossens NV (C-89/10, C-96/10); ET Agrokonsulting-04-Velko Stoyanov v Izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond ‘Zemedelie’ — Razplashtatelna agentsia (C-93/12); Friedrich G. Barth v Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung (C-542/08); Susanne Bulicke v Deutsche Büro Service GmbH (C-246/09); 2001/822/EC: Council Decision of 27 November 2001 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Community ("Overseas Association Decision"); TDC A/S v Erhvervsstyrelsen (C-222/13); Tonina Enza Iaia and Others v Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca and Others (C-452/09); Evelyn Danqua v Minister for Justice and Equality and Others (C-429/15); X BV and TBG Limited v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-24/12, C-27/12); Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, and Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht (C-280/00)