Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Drago Nemec v Republika Slovenija (C-256/15)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
Question 3
48

Drago Nemec v Republika Slovenija (C-256/15)

Judgment of 15 Dec 2016law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-256-15/para_48@2026-11-11

48Directive 2000/35 does not, on the other hand, include rules relating to the period during which interest for late payment runs or to the maximum amount of interest.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-256/15 · ECLI:EU:C:2016:954
Decided: 15 Dec 2016
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Vrhovno sodišče (Supreme Court, Slovenia)
Applicant: Drago Nemec
Defendant: Republika Slovenija
Rapporteur: A. Tizzano
Advocate General: M. Bobek
Bench: 5 judges
J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, A. Tizzano, M. Berger, A. Borg Barthet, E. Levits
Language: Slovenian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0256

Topics

Approximation of laws

History · 1 version

15 Dec 2016Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on combating late payment in commercial transactions
Cited by 13: RL sp. z o.o. v J.M (C-199/19); IOS Finance EFC SA v Servicio Murciano de Salud (C-555/14); Česká pojišťovna a.s. v WCZ spol. s r.o (C-287/17); 'UniCredit Leasing' EAD v Direktor na Direktsia 'Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika' – Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (NAP) (C-242/18); Agenciart – Management Artístico Lda. v CT (C-643/23)3 provisions; E. sp.j. v C. sp. z o.o (C-481/24); AK v RU (C-197/24); Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel v European Central Bank (T-751/16)2 provisions; BNP Paribas v European Central Bank (T-768/16)2 provisions; Société générale v European Central Bank (T-757/16)2 provisions; Crédit agricole SA v European Central Bank (T-758/16)2 provisions; BPCE v European Central Bank (T-745/16)2 provisions; La Banque postale v European Central Bank (T-733/16)2 provisions
Cites 9: Caffaro Srl v Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale RM/C (C-265/07); Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on combating late payment in commercial transactions; Gmina Wrocław v Minister Finansów (C-276/14); Tomasz Ziolkowski and Barbara Szeja and Others v Land Berlin (C-424/10, C-425/10); European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-385/08); Elektrownia Pątnów II sp. zoo v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Poznaniu (C-441/08); 01051 Telecom GmbH v Deutsche Telekom AG (C-306/06); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-302/05); María Elena Pérez López v Servicio Madrileño de Salud (Comunidad de Madrid) (C-16/15)