Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Milena Tomášová v Slovenská republika - Ministerstvo spravodlivosti SR and Pohotovosť s.r.o (C-168/15)
Consideration of the questions referred
The first to third questions
23

Milena Tomášová v Slovenská republika - Ministerstvo spravodlivosti SR and Pohotovosť s.r.o (C-168/15)

Judgment of 28 Jul 2016law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-168-15/para_23@2026-11-12

23The liability of a Member State for damage caused by the decision of a court adjudicating at last instance which breaches a rule of EU law is governed by the same conditions (see judgment of 30 September 2003 in Köbler, C‑224/01, EU:C:2003:513, paragraph 52).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-168/15 · ECLI:EU:C:2016:602
Decided: 28 Jul 2016
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Okresný súd Prešov (Prešov District Court, Slovakia)
Applicant: Milena Tomášová
Defendants: Slovenská republika – Ministerstvo spravodlivosti SR; Pohotovosť s. r. o.
Intervener: Združenie na ochranu občana spotrebiteľa HOOS
Rapporteur: R. Silva de Lapuerta
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.‑C. Bonichot, C.G. Fernlund, S. Rodin, E. Regan
Language: Slovak
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0168

Topics

Approximation of laws Consumer protection

History · 1 version

28 Jul 2016Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Council Directive 93/13/EEC; Pannon GSM Zrt. v Erzsébet Sustikné Győrfi (C-243/08)
Cited by 10: Fernand Ullens de Schooten v État belge (C-268/15)2 provisions; Nikolay Kantarev v Balgarska Narodna Banka (C-571/16); Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Freistaat Bayern (C-752/18); BX v Statul Român – Ministerul Finanţelor Publice and Curtea de Apel Bucureşti (C-163/24); João Filipe Ferreira da Silva e Brito and Others v Estado português (C-293/24); European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-278/20); Euromin Holdings (Cyprus) Limited (C-735/19); Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri v BV (C-129/19); Appeals – Actions for damages – Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU – Excessive length of the proceedings in a case before the General Court of the European Union – Compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicant – Concept of a ‘single undertaking’ not applied – Material damage – Bank guarantee costs – Causal link – Loss of profit – Non-pecuniary damage – Liability of the European Union for damage caused by infringements of EU law arising from a decision of the General Court – No incurring of liability (C-447/17 P, C-479/17 P); Hochtief Solutions AG Magyarországi Fióktelepe v Fővárosi Törvényszék (C-620/17)2 provisions
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Directive 93/13/EEC; Banco Español de Crédito, SA v Joaquín Calderón Camino (C-618/10); Asturcom Telecomunicaciones SL v Cristina Rodríguez Nogueira (C-40/08); Banif Plus Bank Zrt v Csaba Csipai and Viktória Csipai (C-472/11); ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt v Attila Sugár (C-32/14); Pannon GSM Zrt. v Erzsébet Sustikné Győrfi (C-243/08); Pohotovosť s. r. o. v Miroslav Vašuta (C-470/12); Océano Grupo Editorial SA v Roció Murciano Quintero and Salvat Editores SA v José M. Sánchez Alcón Prades, José Luis Copano Badillo, Mohammed Berroane and Emilio Viñas Feliú (C-240/98, C-241/98, C-242/98, C-243/98, C-244/98); Andrea Francovich and Danila Bonifaci and others v Italian Republic (C-6/90, C-9/90); Günter Fuß v Stadt Halle (C-429/09); Cofidis SA v Jean-Louis Fredout (C-473/00); Elisa María Mostaza Claro v Centro Móvil Milenium SL (C-168/05); Brasserie du Pêcheur SA v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and The Queen v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte: Factortame Ltd and others (C-46/93, C-48/93); Danske Slagterier v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-445/06); Pohotovosť s.r.o. v Iveta Korčkovská (C-76/10); Gerhard Köbler v Republik Österreich (C-224/01)2 provisions; Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (C-446/04); João Filipe Ferreira da Silva e Brito and Others v Estado português (C-160/14); Jutta Leth v Republik Österreich, Land Niederösterreich (C-420/11); Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA v Repubblica italiana (C-173/03)