58As the Advocate General observed in point 71 of his Opinion, the fact that those questions might prove to be relevant in connection with a possible review of the constitutionality of the Law on financial collateral by the Latvijas Republikas Satversmes tiesa (Constitutional Court) cannot remove the hypothetical character of those questions in the present case.
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.