Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Marine Harvest ASA v European Commission (T-704/14)
III. Law
A. First plea in law, alleging a manif…
1. The first three parts of the first…
(b)The applicability of Article 7(2) o…
(2)The applicant’s arguments in relati…
(vi)The applicant’s arguments to the e…
178

Marine Harvest ASA v European Commission (T-704/14)

Judgment of 26 Oct 2017law://eu/cjeu/2014/t-704-14/para_178@2026-11-12

178First of all, it must be observed that the purpose of a document such as the Green Paper is merely to stimulate discussion on given topics at European level.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fifth Chamber
Case: T-704/14 · ECLI:EU:T:2017:753
Decided: 26 Oct 2017
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Marine Harvest ASA
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: A. Dittrich
Bench: 3 judges
A. Dittrich, J. Schwarcz, V. Tomljenović
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014TJ0704

Topics

Concentrations between undertakings

History · 1 version

26 Oct 2017Reading

Connections

Cited by 11: Amer Foz v Council of the European Union (T-414/24); Altice Group Lux Sàrl v European Commission (C-746/21 P)2 provisions; Dmitry Arkadievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union (T-282/22); EVH GmbH v European Commission (T-312/20)2 provisions; GGEW, Gruppen-Gas- und Elektrizitätswerk Bergstraße AG v European Commission (T-319/20); TEAG Thüringer Energie AG v European Commission (T-315/20); Stadtwerke Leipzig GmbH v European Commission (T-313/20); EnergieVerbund Dresden GmbH v European Commission (T-317/20); Canon Inc. v European Commission (T-609/19)13 provisions; Tokin Corp. v European Commission (T-343/18); Nichicon Corporation v European Commission (T-342/18)
Cites 22: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; flyLAL-Lithuanian Airlines AS v Starptautiskā lidosta Rīga VAS and Air Baltic Corporation AS (C-302/13); Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde and Bundeskartellanwalt v Schenker & Co. AG and Others (C-681/11); Interporc Im- und Export GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-41/00 P); Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst v X BV (C-429/07); Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon v European Commission (C-386/10 P); Transcatab SpA v European Commission (T-39/06); Karen Millen Fashions Ltd v Dunnes Stores and Dunnes Stores (Limerick) Ltd (C-345/13); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between undertakings; Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance); E.ON Energie AG v European Commission (C-89/11 P); Atlantic Container Line AB and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-191/98, T-212/98, T-213/98, T-214/98); NV Nederlandsche Banden Industrie Michelin v Commission of the European Communities (322/81); Telefónica SA and Telefónica de España SAU v European Commission (C-295/12 P); Cementbouw Handel & Industrie BV v Commission of the European Communities (T-282/02); Energetický a průmyslový holding a.s. and EP Investment Advisors s.r.o. v European Commission (T-272/12); Romana Tabacchi Srl v European Commission (T-11/06); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80); Electrabel v European Commission (T-332/09); Roquette Frères SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-322/01)