Judgment_paragraph 56 · Group OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-567/14)

56Therefore, the conclusion is that the conditions arising from the judgment of 3 October 2013 in Rintisch v OHIM (C‑120/12 P, EU:C:2013:638) do not apply in the present case and that the Board of Appeal’s discretion in taking into account facts and evidence adduced late laid down in Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 did not need to be exercised in a restrictive manner.

Group OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-567/14)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version