Judgment_paragraph 46 · Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU v European Commission (T-468/14)

46However, although a party may take action by means of a claim for compensation without being obliged by any provision of law to seek the annulment of the illegal measure which causes him damage, he may not by those means circumvent the inadmissibility of an application which concerns the same instance of illegality and which has the same financial end in view (order of 26 October 1995 in Pevasa and Inpesca v Commission, C‑199/94 P and C‑200/94 P, EU:C:1995:360, paragraph 27).

Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU v European Commission (T-468/14)

Connections

Key facts

History · 1 version