Judgment_paragraph 54 · European Commission v ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias (C-78/14 P)

54With regard to the alleged distortion of the evidence by the General Court, although it is true that the Commission, in accordance with settled case-law, has expressly pleaded such distortion (see, inter alia, order in Walcher Meßtechnik v OHIM, C‑374/14 P, EU:C:2015:101, paragraph 27), it should, however, be noted that, according to equally settled case-law, that distortion must be obvious from the documents on the Court’s file, without there being any need to carry out a new assessment of the facts and evidence (see judgment in Tomra Systems and Others v Commission, C‑549/10 P, EU:C:2012:221, paragraph 27 and the case-law cited).

European Commission v ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias (C-78/14 P)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections