Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Xavier Grau Ferrer (C-597/14 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The second ground of appeal
25

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Xavier Grau Ferrer (C-597/14 P)

Judgment of 21 Jul 2016law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-597-14/para_25@2026-11-12

25In that connection, it must be recalled that Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009, which constitutes the legal basis for Rule 50 of the Implementing Regulation, provides that the Office may disregard facts or evidence which are not submitted in due time by the parties concerned.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-597/14 P · ECLI:EU:C:2016:579
Decided: 21 Jul 2016
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Defendant: Xavier Grau Ferrer
Rapporteur: S. Rodin
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.-C. Bonichot, C.G. Fernlund, S. Rodin, E. Regan
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0597

Topics

History · 1 version

21 Jul 2016Reading

Connections

Cited by 22: Fractal Analytics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-194/23); Fractal Analytics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-211/23); Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-638/21); Heitec AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-520/19); Globalia Corporación Empresarial, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-44/19); Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-89/18); Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-718/16)2 provisions; LA Superquimica, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-24/17); Richard Hugh Blackmore v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-344/16); European Union Intellectual Property Office v Puma SE (C-564/16 P); Skyleader a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-34/17); European Union Intellectual Property Office v Group OOD (C-478/16); mobile.de GmbH, anciennement mobile.international GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-418/16 P)2 provisions; Philip Morris Brands Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-105/16); European Union Intellectual Property Office v European Food SA (C-634/16 P); Hochmann Marketing GmbH, formerly Bittorrent Marketing GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-771/15); Galletas Gullón, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-456/16); Moravia Consulting spol. s r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-316/16)2 provisions; Moravia Consulting spol. s r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-317/16); Moravia Consulting spol. s r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-318/16); Continental Reifen Deutschland GmbH v Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin (C-84/16); GP Joule PV GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-235/16)
Cites 13: Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (Text with EEA relevance); SIA Kurcums Metal v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (C-558/11); New Yorker SHK Jeans GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-621/11 P); Salzgitter AG, formerly Preussag Stahl AG v Commission of the European Communities and Federal Republic of Germany (C-210/98 P); Economic and Social Committee of the European Communities v E (C-150/98 P); Bernhard Rintisch v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-120/12 P); European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Xavier Grau Ferrer (C-597/14); Bernhard Rintisch v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-122/12 P); Xavier Grau Ferrer v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-543/12); Bernhard Rintisch v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-121/12 P); GSV Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Észak-Alföldi Regionális Vám- és Pénzügyőri Főigazgatósága (C-74/13); Società Finanziaria Siderurgica Finsider SpA (in liquidation) v Commission of the European Communities (C-320/92 P); Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark