Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) and European Commission vAlouminion tis Ellados VEAE (C-590/14 P)

Judgment of 26 Oct 2016

law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-590-14/para_57@2026-11-12

57It follows that, as DEI argues, the case-law settled by the judgments of 4 December 2013, Commission v Council (C‑121/10, EU:C:2013:784, paragraph 59); and of 4 December 2013, Commission v Council (C‑111/10, EU:C:2013:785, paragraph 58), according to which extension of the existing aid scheme creates new aid, follows the same logic as the judgments of 9 August 1994, Namur-Les assurances du crédit (C‑44/93, EU:C:1994:311); and of 20 May 2010, Todaro Nunziatina & C. (C‑138/09, EU:C:2010:291). It must, moreover, be emphasised that, in those judgments of 4 December 2013, the Court expressly referred to paragraphs 46 and 47 of the latter judgment.

Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) and European Commission vAlouminion tis Ellados VEAE (C-590/14 P)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections