Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Jean-Charles Marchiani v European Parliament (C-566/14 P)
Judgment
The appeal
Admissibility of the appeal in its ent…
34

Jean-Charles Marchiani v European Parliament (C-566/14 P)

Judgment of 14 Jun 2016law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-566-14/para_34@2026-11-11

34That said, the conclusion reached in the previous paragraph does not prejudice a consideration of the admissibility of certain grounds of appeal taken individually (see, to that effect, judgment of 11 July 2013 in France v Commission, C‑601/11 P, EU:C:2013:465, paragraphs 70, 71 and 73).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-566/14 P · ECLI:EU:C:2016:437
Decided: 14 Jun 2016
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Jean-Charles Marchiani
Defendant: European Parliament
Rapporteur: M. Ilešič
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 15 judges
K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, R. Silva de Lapuerta, M. Ilešič, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, A. Arabadjiev, C. Toader, D. Šváby, F. Biltgen, J.-C. Bonichot, M. Safjan, E. Jarašiūnas, C.G. Fernlund, C. Vajda, S. Rodin
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0566

Topics

Law governing the institutions

History · 1 version

14 Jun 2016Reading

Connections

Cited by 22: Robert Jarosław Iwaszkiewicz v European Parliament (T-416/25); HG v European Commission (C-899/24); Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission (C-379/22 P); European Commission v Zippo Manufacturing Co. and Zippo GmbH (C-811/23 P); ABLV Bank AS, en liquidation v Single Resolution Board (C-602/22 P)2 provisions; Lara Comi v European Parliament (T-422/23); Aquind Ltd v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-342/23); Crescenzio Rivellini v European Parliament (T-465/23); HG v European Commission (T-494/23); CQ v European Court of Auditors (T-386/19); SBM Développement SAS v European Commission (T-667/22); European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-40/23 P); TC v European Parliament (T-309/21)2 provisions; "Sistem ecologica" production, trade and services d.o.o. Srbac v European Commission (T-81/21); JF v EUCAP Somalia (T-194/20); Christoph Klein v European Commission (C-430/20 P); Datax sp. z o.o. v European Research Executive Agency (T-381/20); Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission (C-650/19 P); European Court of Auditors v Karel Pinxten (C-130/19)2 provisions; Nathalie Griesbeck v European Parliament (T-10/21); European Commission and Council of the European Union v Francisco Carreras Sequeros and Others (C-119/19 P, C-126/19 P); IR v European Commission (T-131/20)
Cites 25: Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-583/11 P); French Republic v People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (C-27/09 P); Kingdom of Sweden v Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) and European Commission, Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) v European Commission and European Commission v Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) (C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P, C-532/07 P); Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (C-469/11 P); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (C-321/09); Oscar Orlando Arango Jaramillo and Others v European Investment Bank (EIB) (C-334/12 RX); Falck SpA and Acciaierie di Bolzano SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-74/00 P, C-75/00 P); Hungary v European Commission (C-31/13 P); Fabbrica italiana accumulatori motocarri Montecchio SpA (FIAMM) and Fabbrica italiana accumulatori motocarri Montecchio Technologies LLC, Giorgio Fedon & Figli SpA and Fedon America, Inc. v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (C-120/06); Evonik Degussa GmbH v Commission of the European Communities and the Council of the European Union (C-266/06); Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities; Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 of 29 October 2012 on the rules of application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union; Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities; Kingdom of Belgium and Forum 187 ASBL v Commission of the European Communities (C-182/03, C-217/03); Commission of the European Communities v Lisrestal - Organização Gestão de Restaurantes Colectivos Ldª, Gabinete Técnico de Informática Ldª (GTI), Lisnico - Serviço Marítimo Internacional Ldª, Rebocalis - Rebocagem e Assistência Marítima Ldª and Gaslimpo - Sociedade de Desgasificação de Navios SA (C-32/95 P); Kingdom of the Netherlands, Koninklijke PTT Nederland NV and PTT Post BV v Commission of the European Communities (C-48/90, C-66/90); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (C-431/14 P); Mindo Srl v European Commission (C-652/11 P); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-501/00); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-287/02); French Republic v European Commission (C-601/11 P); Jean-Charles Marchiani v European Parliament (T-479/13); Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002; Riccardo Nencini v European Parliament (C-447/13 P); Decision of the Bureau of 19 May and 9 July 2008 concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament