Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Kingdom of Sweden v European Commission (C-562/14 P)
Judgment
II.Background to the dispute
11

Kingdom of Sweden v European Commission (C-562/14 P)

Judgment of 11 May 2017law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-562-14/para_11@2026-11-11

11In particular, on 10 May and 10 October 2011, the Commission sent the Federal Republic of Germany two requests for information (‘the documents at issue’), to which the latter replied on 7 July and 4 November 2011 respectively.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-562/14 P · ECLI:EU:C:2017:356
Decided: 11 May 2017
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: Kingdom of Sweden; Darius Nicolai Spirlea; Mihaela Spirlea; residing in Capezzano Pianore (Italy)
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: E. Juhász
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 5 judges
T. von Danwitz, E. Juhász, C. Vajda, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0562

Topics

Access to documents

History · 1 version

11 May 2017Reading

Connections

Cited by 23: Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission (T-185/24); Edward William Batchelor v European Commission (T-433/24); Martijn Frederik Nouwen v Council of the European Union (T-255/24); ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission (C-249/23); Margrete Auken and Others v European Commission (T-689/21); Troy Chemical Company BV v European Commission (T-662/21); ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission (T-354/21); Agrofert, a.s. v European Parliament (T-174/21); Pilatus Bank plc and Pilatus Holding ltd. v European Central Bank (T-27/19); Stichting Comité N 65 Ondergronds Helvoirt v European Commission (T-569/20); Aeris Invest Sàrl v European Central Bank (T-827/17); AlzChem Group AG v European Commission (T-569/19); Andrea Homoki v European Commission (T-517/19); Public.Resource.Org, Inc. and Right to Know CLG v European Commission (T-185/19); Liam Campbell v European Commission (T-701/18)3 provisions; Compañía de Tranvías de la Coruña, SA v European Commission (T-485/18); CBA Spielapparate- und Restaurantbetriebs GmbH v European Commission (T-168/17); Alcogroup and Alcodis v European Commission (C-403/18 P); Liam Campbell v European Commission (T-312/17); Loreto Sumner v European Commission (T-152/17); Éva Erdősi Galcsikné v European Commission (T-632/17); Anikó Pint v European Commission (T-634/17); Róbert Sárossy v European Commission (T-633/17)
Cites 11: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; ClientEarth v European Commission (C-612/13 P); Koninklijke Grolsch NV v European Commission (T-234/07); Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on advanced therapy medicinal products and amending Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (Text with EEA relevance); Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Commission (C-398/13 P); Kingdom of Sweden and Maurizio Turco v Council of the European Union (C-39/05); Liga para a Protecção da Natureza (LPN) and Republic of Finland v European Commission (C-514/11 P, C-605/11 P); Darius Nicolai Spirlea and Mihaela Spirlea v European Commission (T-306/12)