Judgment_paragraph 14 · Vadzim Ipatau v Council of the European Union (C-535/14 P)

14First, it should be borne in mind that neither the right to effective judicial protection nor the right to be heard is undermined by the strict application of EU rules concerning procedural time-limits which, according to settled case-law, meets the requirements of legal certainty and the need to avoid all discrimination or arbitrary treatment in the administration of justice (see order in Page Protective Services v EEAS, C‑501/13 P, EU:C:2014:2259, paragraph 39 and the case-law cited).

Vadzim Ipatau v Council of the European Union (C-535/14 P)

History · 1 version

Connections

Key facts