Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Aannemingsbedrijf Aertssen NV and Aertssen Terrassements SA v VSB Machineverhuur BV and Others (C-523/14)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referre…
The first question
33

Aannemingsbedrijf Aertssen NV and Aertssen Terrassements SA v VSB Machineverhuur BV and Others (C-523/14)

Judgment of 22 Oct 2015law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-523-14/para_33@2026-11-11

33Further, the general scheme of that regulation does not require that the treatment of ancillary proceedings should necessarily be linked to that of the main proceedings (see, by analogy, judgment in Cavel, 120/79, EU:C:1980:70, paragraphs 7 to 9).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-523/14 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:722
Decided: 22 Oct 2015
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicants: Aannemingsbedrijf Aertssen NV; Aertssen Terrassements SA
Defendants: VSB Machineverhuur BV; Van Sommeren Bestrating BV; Jos van Sommeren
Rapporteur: C. Toader
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, C. Toader, J.-C. Bonichot, E. Jarašiūnas, C.G. Fernlund
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0523

Topics

Judicial cooperation in civil matters

History · 1 version

22 Oct 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
Cited by 5: Belgische Staat and Directeur-Generaal van de Algemene Directie Controle en Bemiddeling van de FOD Economie, K.M.O., Middenstand en Energie v Movic BV and Others (C-73/19)2 provisions; Pula Parking d.o.o. v Sven Klaus Tederahn (C-551/15); ZO v JS (C-381/23); Merck KGaA v Merck & Co. Inc. and Others (C-231/16); HanseYachts AG v Port D’Hiver Yachting SARL and Others (C-29/16)
Cites 16: Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; Ahmed Mahamdia v People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria (C-154/11); Irmengard Weber v Mechthilde Weber (C-438/12); flyLAL-Lithuanian Airlines AS v Starptautiskā lidosta Rīga VAS and Air Baltic Corporation AS (C-302/13); Dieter Krombach v André Bamberski (C-7/98); Cartier parfums — lunettes SAS and Axa Corporate Solutions assurances SA v Ziegler France SA and Others (C-1/13); Nipponkoa Insurance Co. (Europe) Ltd v Inter-Zuid Transport BV (C-452/12); Realchemie Nederland BV v Bayer CropScience AG (C-406/09); Proceedings brought by Siegfried János Schneider (C-386/12); Mærsk Olie & Gas A/S v Firma M. de Haan en W. de Boer (C-39/02); Gantner Electronic GmbH v Basch Exploitatie Maatschappij BV (C-111/01); A v B (C-489/14); Gubisch Maschinenfabrik KG v Giulio Palumbo (144/86); The owners of the cargo lately laden on board the ship "Tatry" v the owners of the ship "Maciej Rataj" (C-406/92); Louise de Cavel v Jacques de Cavel (120/79); Volker Sonntag v Hans Waidmann, Elisabeth Waidmann and Stefan Waidmann (C-172/91)