Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-363/14)
Judgment
The action
Second and third pleas in law: choice…
First part of the second plea in law:…
–Findings of the Court
23

European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-363/14)

Judgment of 10 Sept 2015law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-363-14/para_23@2026-11-11

23The contested decision does not refer to Article 34 EU and the citations in its preamble expressly cite Article 26(1)(a) of the Europol Decision and Articles 5 and 6 of Decision 2009/934.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-363/14 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:579
Decided: 10 Sept 2015
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: European Parliament
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: L. Bay Larsen
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
L. Bay Larsen, K. Jürimäe, J. Malenovský, M. Safjan, A. Prechal
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0363

Topics

Law governing the institutions

History · 1 version

10 Sept 2015Reading

Connections

Cited by 4: Fenix International Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (C-695/20); Dyson Ltd v European Commission (C-44/16 P); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-14/15, C-116/15)2 provisions; DK Recycling und Roheisen GmbH v European Commission (C-540/14 P)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Union (C-81/13); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-133/06); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-540/13); European Commission v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-43/12); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-392/95); Council Decision 2009/935/JHA of 30 November 2009 determining the list of third States and organisations with which Europol shall conclude agreements; Council Decision 2009/934/JHA of 30 November 2009 adopting the implementing rules governing Europol’s relations with partners, including the exchange of personal data and classified information; Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Communities (165/87); 2014/269/EU: Council Implementing Decision of 6 May 2014 amending Decision 2009/935/JHA as regards the list of third States and organisations with which Europol shall conclude agreements; European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-130/10); Mohamed M’Bodj v État belge (C-542/13); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-355/10); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-658/11); Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union (C-370/07); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-317/13, C-679/13); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-316/91); SAT Fluggesellschaft mbH v Eurocontrol (C-364/92); Council Decision of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol)